Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-43130-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <8c4cfc54-bd23-4d56-a4ae-9f3dd5cedb59@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:38:27 +0200
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add
 JH7100 SoC compatible
Content-Language: en-US
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
 Samin Guo <samin.guo@starfivetech.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
 Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
 Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
 devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com
References: <20240126191319.1209821-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
 <20240126191319.1209821-2-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
 <0a6f6dcb-18b0-48d5-8955-76bce0e1295d@linaro.org>
 <e29ae12b-5823-4fba-8029-e8e490462138@collabora.com>
 <56f3bd3c-c099-405b-837b-16d8aeb4cc4b@lunn.ch>
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <56f3bd3c-c099-405b-837b-16d8aeb4cc4b@lunn.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 1/29/24 15:34, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> Thank you for the review!
>>
>> Could you please apply it to the RESEND version [1] instead, as this one 
>> had an issue collecting the latest tags, as indicated in [2].
>>
>> Regards,
>> Cristian
> 
> Hi Cristian
> 
> IT is your job as developers to collect together such reviewed-by:
> tags add apply them to the latest version. So long as there are no
> major changes, they are still consider applicable.

Hi Andrew,

Jakub requested a rebase, but I missed a tag and that's why I submitted
the RESEND.  Now we got this new tag which is not on the RESEND
submission, that's why I asked Krzysztof if he could add his R-b on that
one.  Unless the maintainers' tooling is able to fetch tags from both
submissions?!

Thanks,
Cristian