Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-43447-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:01:33 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: Use set_memory_rox()
Message-ID: <ZbgEHYe6f4WiIKoU@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <98d4db94f19737fe05fd811a4188ff277b83a334.1703143382.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <98d4db94f19737fe05fd811a4188ff277b83a334.1703143382.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Sender: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@infradead.org>

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 08:24:23AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> A couple of architectures seem concerned about calling set_memory_ro()
> and set_memory_x() too frequently and have implemented a version of
> set_memory_rox(), see commit 60463628c9e0 ("x86/mm: Implement native
> set_memory_rox()") and commit 22e99fa56443 ("s390/mm: implement
> set_memory_rox()")
> 
> Use set_memory_rox() in modules when STRICT_MODULES_RWX is set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

Nice simplification. I applied all 3 patches and pushed!

  Luis