Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752090AbXLRTSm (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:18:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751047AbXLRTSc (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:18:32 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]:48822 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750985AbXLRTSb (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:18:31 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=COxh9zVk24fNYcWzPo+dSDH5xzKCqxlewq7b8MSgk0mkumK3T5RoF4j5bIKZSOMhjGodtQHr64bmkJb9lcxghVIGpFgkrHOE1CDDd00l2MR0i/6rrSgapI1Abc285nh2vyOBgLnKiViRy/LyxA7p5ATkdRbrRJqLaa9Glgp6Zc0= Message-ID: <3efb10970712181118w58daac1dw52f776ccf1dd0eae@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:18:30 +0100 From: "Remy Bohmer" To: "Haavard Skinnemoen" Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler Cc: "Andrew Victor" , "ARM Linux Mailing List" , "Russell King - ARM Linux" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20071218181921.2478baa9@dhcp-252-066.norway.atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1197987255-23045-1-git-send-email-hskinnemoen@atmel.com> <3efb10970712180723x2cd22c5ei6b342f0ab7cc39c2@mail.gmail.com> <20071218181921.2478baa9@dhcp-252-066.norway.atmel.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: d28c8a00b555cfe8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 891 Lines: 24 Hello Haavard, > > BTW: Attached I have added a 2nd patch that I use for Preempt-RT. (For > > cleaner startup, and to get rid of useless IRQ-threads. > > Hrm. That assumption isn't valid on AVR32...on AP7000, for example, > IRQ1 is used by the LCD controller. In that case, forget that (dirty) patch completely for now. It does not break things on Preempt-RT, we only will have a IRQ-1 kernel thread that is never scheduled. (Of which I think is actually a irq-manage bug, if there are no handlers that are scheduled on that thread, it should not even start the thread.) I will verify/test the complete patchset tomorrow. Kind Regards, Remy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/