Received: by 2002:a05:7412:d1aa:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id ba42csp883830rdb; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:09:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHiSJQUVz+C5u9LDhYqNUFV9IXVpwgJXfqC/7HuHe+o9RjTyemk2fZSHNgGEMFL3eiaiRKd X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5b81:0:b0:42a:c1e5:2d96 with SMTP id a1-20020ac85b81000000b0042ac1e52d96mr686968qta.72.1706605750905; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:09:10 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j18-20020ac85f92000000b0042ab14ce3d6si1967129qta.403.2024.01.30.01.09.10 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:09:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-44210-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=ElsHSCtB; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-44210-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-44210-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89E9A1C23A92 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08025916B; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ElsHSCtB" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F41758210; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706605720; cv=none; b=gqKLdFWp6fiQ731O7oNB7r+Jquiwupu0tX6YvivD957cksea3Gj3SrjG7gYpUIX/KY10LUaw9SbUUOdCO7iHlSJIX4o4Rj2rRYpBm99CzJVeVzAHrvgKDF/AdIgX8IzvccpVIxb1adhnnyayfWrEg9qLCIH/vv1LK2mZg0ht9x8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706605720; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x3YsoKl3lyXJsq4HIoyY0PO1z6clLK9C7c17IKM8sLk=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=L6SYCqv/vZkJMgmlQsP4s1iTrnvvN34n1b5y+Fg3Ki/DATwrRcHy4mRUyEFMUWdgQJh/0L+9ZcxSTg/7GdvedOSItp+xrww0JDXILk6yHQnwtB1NhbALUjHGPVzVXmLIjL4h2igAJGuzxp9UoBr3/XaXLyKCX17p+34lf7XaNZ0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ElsHSCtB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6C0AC43399; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:08:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706605719; bh=x3YsoKl3lyXJsq4HIoyY0PO1z6clLK9C7c17IKM8sLk=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=ElsHSCtBKq4sD1VLTqnxe3Rl0cHG7Pa9M+R8o+bDcjWfVYI99Cx+gHOwxeUx2F/s8 j5bmFgeTTuF2s4nxFeznnJE2sgWOoGV6nLGZS9XSIa3rrsVQnOSh3tYqOYKjcDUb7g kwwMKNPRRTkZApxHiLdowC1oF4Atf5jD3NxSGV7TzOMsrI4TlyVXeSUPJGv3BIRxsx wRk1g0zRjNMxdwo9OrMIo8bDFeTZPmnklLZ1FIfKDPWp4QE2WXgqdxsFlbtpSKFil6 7u6tiUrdsY89TvOL/rIs38U2Tm7H0hvKYDfNRye+d34+sQYQbM1DGOJ+oinEXZM/rg g66exC1ZOR23A== Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-511203459adso48747e87.1; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:08:39 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxmgWbKLj8a3ZmnHuTPX40YC1IcK6Ewr6beCdzsED4Z+0hckbf3 dM7Le3W8tmVYQZUFGO3dOrX2BAdIwWGJvQoQWv8GSl8Pl7ogKlCfgyrISWfBREKQ9L9f/Kqv2MI xd1U59ufMooVUdoxiSHjo5wFTiA0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:398f:b0:511:19af:f84 with SMTP id j15-20020a056512398f00b0051119af0f84mr1130652lfu.25.1706605717863; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:08:37 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240130021843.3608859-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> In-Reply-To: <20240130021843.3608859-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> From: Song Liu Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:08:26 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] dm-raid: fix v6.7 regressions To: Yu Kuai , Mikulas Patocka , Zdenek Kabelac Cc: heinzm@redhat.com, xni@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, yukuai3@huawei.com, jbrassow@f14.redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, shli@fb.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 6:23=E2=80=AFPM Yu Kuai w= rote: > [...] > > Test result: > > I apply this patchset on top of v6.8-rc1, and run lvm2 tests suite with > folling cmd for 24 round(for about 2 days): > > for t in `ls test/shell`; do > if cat test/shell/$t | grep raid &> /dev/null; then > make check T=3Dshell/$t > fi > done > > failed count failed test > 1 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/dmsecuretest.sh > 1 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/dmsetup-integrity-keys.sh > 1 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/dmsetup-keyring.sh > 5 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/duplicate-pvs-md0.sh > 1 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/duplicate-vgid.sh > 2 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/duplicate-vgnames.sh > 1 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/fsadm-crypt.sh > 1 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/integrity.sh > 6 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvchange-raid1-writemostly= sh > 2 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvchange-rebuild-raid.sh > 5 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvconvert-raid-reshape-str= ipes-load-reload.sh > 4 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvconvert-raid-restripe-li= near.sh > 1 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvconvert-raid1-split-trac= kchanges.sh > 20 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvconvert-repair-raid.sh > 20 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvcreate-large-raid.sh > 24 ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvextend-raid.sh > > And I ramdomly pick some tests verified by hand that these test will > fail in v6.6 as well(not all tests, I don't have the time do do this yet)= : > > shell/lvextend-raid.sh > shell/lvcreate-large-raid.sh > shell/lvconvert-repair-raid.sh > shell/lvchange-rebuild-raid.sh > shell/lvchange-raid1-writemostly.sh Hi Mikulas, Could you please advise the proper way to run the tests and to interpret the results? Are these failures on 6.6 expected? We hope to run lvm2 tests regularly for all md patches. However, Yu Kuai has spent days on this, and it seems really hard to run it properly once. Thanks, Song