Received: by 2002:a05:7412:d1aa:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id ba42csp1182496rdb; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:09:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGI427a9qYlUyjw9JcVKJoKRwrvi83mYsEBPjz58z7CTjJxdANjq9ATBXL5xHI/dGi08jbo X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1c02:b0:a30:d5ae:2833 with SMTP id k2-20020a1709061c0200b00a30d5ae2833mr7183429ejg.56.1706638164885; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:09:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1706638164; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j82fg5EE54N8DAvXPdtiZA2vKOxGRY9O9UQ8K3WxEK6Qfv75T1q7xRopegUX4DXTbD gMI5czxTnJhBCMtW6RUABDQ9f40lqq62v2wdtdMWtHWAJDtn1blfBaI3n4mLAAaUz2Ee lJW2DCDuFwNdnn0vv3p7gnbg3jrE0IC0j5qCN1aRjHPJPAtRkfKK6olLFXGUBMYUY2NT s9EQjbX6SIliYO5DlAIrZtWmOvy8IOVnG+z31vRrV4i5EG/4Hf+84E9jCMFj4QciAUWQ thA8Wv6KaIyS1b3fyD0apKUbMWQpnaKxcdXFfrEdtpq6FyzLcVMhCbKnaBir/qyvOeUn B73A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=0ryXEG7EgySVxFrmzf83rg3LoJH7bWX+DUExYZTJCQg=; fh=6V3heEuFn9Qs2Gfqe/N4HQvG19fIq7ViN9HwS1nP4oM=; b=oRqt3FXt3M8PZz5dad2S+gyKbYv14CukzGMVCLb1UTZhwxqF7N9XMDyQagTjz9mFvT Nl4FLzc/153oUklmfLMhWkaIWPeQ3718AcAjNXbX6QyVnE5TZGKZPWBkOdhfIX/Tj+NL Zord3TnWzq4xO43J6sY3qy0rbWsYLU2j0/3V5zXMe8x67sxQHiowXkcJu99ngRdXtkwo 0BQgU+x594wjNghKCMmYzkkYMJsmikK0Eic/XErVx+Z9LTeOQzz3qreasKHXw9xMi2n2 1J7ZzqAOoMkbjyznAWh2vLWWQpEeNB6COUDcr/vMOw5IXtYwdhtPN9epo7KjCFWNSNnH MS0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=c0KBuxxy; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=intel.com dkim=pass dkdomain=intel.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=intel.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-45080-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-45080-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h22-20020a17090619d600b00a32f37e4cf8si4817089ejd.378.2024.01.30.10.09.24 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:09:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-45080-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=c0KBuxxy; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=intel.com dkim=pass dkdomain=intel.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=intel.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-45080-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-45080-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738A91F25899 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE007129A8F; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="c0KBuxxy" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28756155A5D; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706638153; cv=none; b=JcbOurat75TUgOSivsrnzhf1Hd+ZvoSFegwEOFoA7lm3DyaCu0QlEDHL+wQq/aSs4E/rzKNxoDcrWlUY4R+8fiyVqUKyZ7UKE/wT3/idDfRDCloZ3sjS8zU3wkat6rKf4a21YQdpQbbs1iAn3b0b5CiURCl6WASYj2iii67YRGo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706638153; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qPHLBGQcbx+a/P2SvHS9zlzFDNbMb9t0tcjBhxjZ6aQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=j3KXVwHX+YRsfc1NYE/p9NDPy2wJEwx/ZYM8oaHWiP9UA9J5/WNWBs7hDO7kHn6yREe9hpBM/l5MYcv9FZgvjPgD4xYqtPYFhxXmRXwXdsaJ9XttBJOLCc2LjFi4TGlYlNThefpjIiNJJiBhf1E3oPTkuZZT3+dFQyyVoc6Bqrs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=c0KBuxxy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706638151; x=1738174151; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=qPHLBGQcbx+a/P2SvHS9zlzFDNbMb9t0tcjBhxjZ6aQ=; b=c0KBuxxy8EmQXySKRUb+3laaPQFQ0J8iTb1ZJZo7QiixOQubVZQFTiML 2PjTpOryRs+zToBZXUB4g0hv4uas9Jdp1An3ooFzQ/L7I9p4T7kpVR3R4 0MloUKwnEYInAz2MXUiu6OtDUE2tSWa/pXOCo5+oPyG8v7uRfWrmIoCNd b7xBnA0AFHRhsVH/tBUN/oI3Wou9YHPH8Nx57XFRHnDSVBdtZsY6VlNid 7iGgGS8x5VHA8UdvAVKahrzgT0eWVLoguJ9EjUVd78e9FwahIk2DruDz9 FJxuLVzQkKNY0gbwG3bQKeMWCS65aJ8YvW+FDFGNUOogxmIlw0gZEhnNf A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10969"; a="10108752" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,230,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="10108752" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jan 2024 10:09:10 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,230,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="36584202" Received: from b49691a74b80.jf.intel.com ([10.165.54.183]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2024 10:09:09 -0800 From: weilin.wang@intel.com To: weilin.wang@intel.com, Namhyung Kim , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ian Rogers , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Perry Taylor , Samantha Alt , Caleb Biggers , Mark Rutland Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] perf test: Simplify metric value validation test final report Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:09:07 -0800 Message-ID: <20240130180907.639729-1-weilin.wang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Weilin Wang The original test report was too complicated to read with information that not really useful. This new update simplify the report which should largely improve the readibility. Signed-off-by: Weilin Wang --- .../tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py | 231 ++++++++++-------- tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_values.sh | 4 +- 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py index 50a34a9cc040..a2d235252183 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 import re import csv import json @@ -6,36 +6,61 @@ import argparse from pathlib import Path import subprocess + +class TestError: + def __init__(self, metric: list[str], wl: str, value: list[float], low: float, up=float('nan'), description=str()): + self.metric: list = metric # multiple metrics in relationship type tests + self.workloads = [wl] # multiple workloads possible + self.collectedValue: list = value + self.valueLowBound = low + self.valueUpBound = up + self.description = description + + def __repr__(self) -> str: + if len(self.metric) > 1: + return "\nMetric Relationship Error: \tThe collected value of metric {0}\n\ + \tis {1} in workload(s): {2} \n\ + \tbut expected value range is [{3}, {4}]\n\ + \tRelationship rule description: \'{5}\'".format(self.metric, self.collectedValue, self.workloads, + self.valueLowBound, self.valueUpBound, self.description) + elif len(self.collectedValue) == 0: + return "\nNo Metric Value Error: \tMetric {0} returns with no value \n\ + \tworkload(s): {1}".format(self.metric, self.workloads) + else: + return "\nWrong Metric Value Error: \tThe collected value of metric {0}\n\ + \tis {1} in workload(s): {2}\n\ + \tbut expected value range is [{3}, {4}]"\ + .format(self.metric, self.collectedValue, self.workloads, + self.valueLowBound, self.valueUpBound) + + class Validator: def __init__(self, rulefname, reportfname='', t=5, debug=False, datafname='', fullrulefname='', workload='true', metrics=''): self.rulefname = rulefname self.reportfname = reportfname self.rules = None - self.collectlist:str = metrics + self.collectlist: str = metrics self.metrics = self.__set_metrics(metrics) self.skiplist = set() self.tolerance = t self.workloads = [x for x in workload.split(",") if x] - self.wlidx = 0 # idx of current workloads - self.allresults = dict() # metric results of all workload - self.allignoremetrics = dict() # metrics with no results or negative results - self.allfailtests = dict() + self.wlidx = 0 # idx of current workloads + self.allresults = dict() # metric results of all workload self.alltotalcnt = dict() self.allpassedcnt = dict() - self.allerrlist = dict() - self.results = dict() # metric results of current workload + self.results = dict() # metric results of current workload # vars for test pass/failure statistics - self.ignoremetrics= set() # metrics with no results or negative results, neg result counts as a failed test - self.failtests = dict() + # metrics with no results or negative results, neg result counts failed tests + self.ignoremetrics = set() self.totalcnt = 0 self.passedcnt = 0 # vars for errors self.errlist = list() # vars for Rule Generator - self.pctgmetrics = set() # Percentage rule + self.pctgmetrics = set() # Percentage rule # vars for debug self.datafname = datafname @@ -69,10 +94,10 @@ class Validator: ensure_ascii=True, indent=4) - def get_results(self, idx:int = 0): + def get_results(self, idx: int = 0): return self.results[idx] - def get_bounds(self, lb, ub, error, alias={}, ridx:int = 0) -> list: + def get_bounds(self, lb, ub, error, alias={}, ridx: int = 0) -> list: """ Get bounds and tolerance from lb, ub, and error. If missing lb, use 0.0; missing ub, use float('inf); missing error, use self.tolerance. @@ -85,7 +110,7 @@ class Validator: tolerance, denormalized base on upper bound value """ # init ubv and lbv to invalid values - def get_bound_value (bound, initval, ridx): + def get_bound_value(bound, initval, ridx): val = initval if isinstance(bound, int) or isinstance(bound, float): val = bound @@ -113,10 +138,10 @@ class Validator: return lbv, ubv, denormerr - def get_value(self, name:str, ridx:int = 0) -> list: + def get_value(self, name: str, ridx: int = 0) -> list: """ Get value of the metric from self.results. - If result of this metric is not provided, the metric name will be added into self.ignoremetics and self.errlist. + If result of this metric is not provided, the metric name will be added into self.ignoremetics. All future test(s) on this metric will fail. @param name: name of the metric @@ -142,7 +167,7 @@ class Validator: Check if metrics value are non-negative. One metric is counted as one test. Failure: when metric value is negative or not provided. - Metrics with negative value will be added into the self.failtests['PositiveValueTest'] and self.ignoremetrics. + Metrics with negative value will be added into self.ignoremetrics. """ negmetric = dict() pcnt = 0 @@ -155,25 +180,27 @@ class Validator: else: pcnt += 1 tcnt += 1 + # The first round collect_perf() run these metrics with simple workload + # "true". We give metrics a second chance with a longer workload if less + # than 20 metrics failed positive test. if len(rerun) > 0 and len(rerun) < 20: second_results = dict() self.second_test(rerun, second_results) for name, val in second_results.items(): - if name not in negmetric: continue + if name not in negmetric: + continue if val >= 0: del negmetric[name] pcnt += 1 - self.failtests['PositiveValueTest']['Total Tests'] = tcnt - self.failtests['PositiveValueTest']['Passed Tests'] = pcnt if len(negmetric.keys()): self.ignoremetrics.update(negmetric.keys()) - negmessage = ["{0}(={1:.4f})".format(name, val) for name, val in negmetric.items()] - self.failtests['PositiveValueTest']['Failed Tests'].append({'NegativeValue': negmessage}) + self.errlist.extend( + [TestError([m], self.workloads[self.wlidx], negmetric[m], 0) for m in negmetric.keys()]) return - def evaluate_formula(self, formula:str, alias:dict, ridx:int = 0): + def evaluate_formula(self, formula: str, alias: dict, ridx: int = 0): """ Evaluate the value of formula. @@ -187,10 +214,11 @@ class Validator: sign = "+" f = str() - #TODO: support parenthesis? + # TODO: support parenthesis? for i in range(len(formula)): if i+1 == len(formula) or formula[i] in ('+', '-', '*', '/'): - s = alias[formula[b:i]] if i+1 < len(formula) else alias[formula[b:]] + s = alias[formula[b:i]] if i + \ + 1 < len(formula) else alias[formula[b:]] v = self.get_value(s, ridx) if not v: errs.append(s) @@ -228,49 +256,49 @@ class Validator: alias = dict() for m in rule['Metrics']: alias[m['Alias']] = m['Name'] - lbv, ubv, t = self.get_bounds(rule['RangeLower'], rule['RangeUpper'], rule['ErrorThreshold'], alias, ridx=rule['RuleIndex']) - val, f = self.evaluate_formula(rule['Formula'], alias, ridx=rule['RuleIndex']) + lbv, ubv, t = self.get_bounds( + rule['RangeLower'], rule['RangeUpper'], rule['ErrorThreshold'], alias, ridx=rule['RuleIndex']) + val, f = self.evaluate_formula( + rule['Formula'], alias, ridx=rule['RuleIndex']) + + lb = rule['RangeLower'] + ub = rule['RangeUpper'] + if isinstance(lb, str): + if lb in alias: + lb = alias[lb] + if isinstance(ub, str): + if ub in alias: + ub = alias[ub] + if val == -1: - self.failtests['RelationshipTest']['Failed Tests'].append({'RuleIndex': rule['RuleIndex'], 'Description':f}) + self.errlist.append(TestError([m['Name'] for m in rule['Metrics']], self.workloads[self.wlidx], [], + lb, ub, rule['Description'])) elif not self.check_bound(val, lbv, ubv, t): - lb = rule['RangeLower'] - ub = rule['RangeUpper'] - if isinstance(lb, str): - if lb in alias: - lb = alias[lb] - if isinstance(ub, str): - if ub in alias: - ub = alias[ub] - self.failtests['RelationshipTest']['Failed Tests'].append({'RuleIndex': rule['RuleIndex'], 'Formula':f, - 'RangeLower': lb, 'LowerBoundValue': self.get_value(lb), - 'RangeUpper': ub, 'UpperBoundValue':self.get_value(ub), - 'ErrorThreshold': t, 'CollectedValue': val}) + self.errlist.append(TestError([m['Name'] for m in rule['Metrics']], self.workloads[self.wlidx], [val], + lb, ub, rule['Description'])) else: self.passedcnt += 1 - self.failtests['RelationshipTest']['Passed Tests'] += 1 self.totalcnt += 1 - self.failtests['RelationshipTest']['Total Tests'] += 1 return - # Single Metric Test - def single_test(self, rule:dict): + def single_test(self, rule: dict): """ Validate if the metrics are in the required value range. eg. lower_bound <= metrics_value <= upper_bound One metric is counted as one test in this type of test. One rule may include one or more metrics. Failure: when the metric value not provided or the value is outside the bounds. - This test updates self.total_cnt and records failed tests in self.failtest['SingleMetricTest']. + This test updates self.total_cnt. @param rule: dict with metrics to validate and the value range requirement """ - lbv, ubv, t = self.get_bounds(rule['RangeLower'], rule['RangeUpper'], rule['ErrorThreshold']) + lbv, ubv, t = self.get_bounds( + rule['RangeLower'], rule['RangeUpper'], rule['ErrorThreshold']) metrics = rule['Metrics'] passcnt = 0 totalcnt = 0 - faillist = list() failures = dict() rerun = list() for m in metrics: @@ -286,25 +314,20 @@ class Validator: second_results = dict() self.second_test(rerun, second_results) for name, val in second_results.items(): - if name not in failures: continue + if name not in failures: + continue if self.check_bound(val, lbv, ubv, t): passcnt += 1 del failures[name] else: - failures[name] = val + failures[name] = [val] self.results[0][name] = val self.totalcnt += totalcnt self.passedcnt += passcnt - self.failtests['SingleMetricTest']['Total Tests'] += totalcnt - self.failtests['SingleMetricTest']['Passed Tests'] += passcnt if len(failures.keys()) != 0: - faillist = [{'MetricName':name, 'CollectedValue':val} for name, val in failures.items()] - self.failtests['SingleMetricTest']['Failed Tests'].append({'RuleIndex':rule['RuleIndex'], - 'RangeLower': rule['RangeLower'], - 'RangeUpper': rule['RangeUpper'], - 'ErrorThreshold':rule['ErrorThreshold'], - 'Failure':faillist}) + self.errlist.extend([TestError([name], self.workloads[self.wlidx], val, + rule['RangeLower'], rule['RangeUpper']) for name, val in failures.items()]) return @@ -312,19 +335,11 @@ class Validator: """ Create final report and write into a JSON file. """ - alldata = list() - for i in range(0, len(self.workloads)): - reportstas = {"Total Rule Count": self.alltotalcnt[i], "Passed Rule Count": self.allpassedcnt[i]} - data = {"Metric Validation Statistics": reportstas, "Tests in Category": self.allfailtests[i], - "Errors":self.allerrlist[i]} - alldata.append({"Workload": self.workloads[i], "Report": data}) - - json_str = json.dumps(alldata, indent=4) - print("Test validation finished. Final report: ") - print(json_str) + print(self.errlist) if self.debug: - allres = [{"Workload": self.workloads[i], "Results": self.allresults[i]} for i in range(0, len(self.workloads))] + allres = [{"Workload": self.workloads[i], "Results": self.allresults[i]} + for i in range(0, len(self.workloads))] self.json_dump(allres, self.datafname) def check_rule(self, testtype, metric_list): @@ -342,13 +357,13 @@ class Validator: return True # Start of Collector and Converter - def convert(self, data: list, metricvalues:dict): + def convert(self, data: list, metricvalues: dict): """ Convert collected metric data from the -j output to dict of {metric_name:value}. """ for json_string in data: try: - result =json.loads(json_string) + result = json.loads(json_string) if "metric-unit" in result and result["metric-unit"] != "(null)" and result["metric-unit"] != "": name = result["metric-unit"].split(" ")[1] if len(result["metric-unit"].split(" ")) > 1 \ else result["metric-unit"] @@ -365,9 +380,10 @@ class Validator: print(" ".join(command)) cmd = subprocess.run(command, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, encoding='utf-8') data = [x+'}' for x in cmd.stderr.split('}\n') if x] + if data[0][0] != '{': + data[0] = data[0][data[0].find('{'):] return data - def collect_perf(self, workload: str): """ Collect metric data with "perf stat -M" on given workload with -a and -j. @@ -385,14 +401,18 @@ class Validator: if rule["TestType"] == "RelationshipTest": metrics = [m["Name"] for m in rule["Metrics"]] if not any(m not in collectlist[0] for m in metrics): - collectlist[rule["RuleIndex"]] = [",".join(list(set(metrics)))] + collectlist[rule["RuleIndex"]] = [ + ",".join(list(set(metrics)))] for idx, metrics in collectlist.items(): - if idx == 0: wl = "true" - else: wl = workload + if idx == 0: + wl = "true" + else: + wl = workload for metric in metrics: data = self._run_perf(metric, wl) - if idx not in self.results: self.results[idx] = dict() + if idx not in self.results: + self.results[idx] = dict() self.convert(data, self.results[idx]) return @@ -412,7 +432,8 @@ class Validator: 2) create metric name list """ command = ['perf', 'list', '-j', '--details', 'metrics'] - cmd = subprocess.run(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, encoding='utf-8') + cmd = subprocess.run(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, + stderr=subprocess.PIPE, encoding='utf-8') try: data = json.loads(cmd.stdout) for m in data: @@ -453,12 +474,12 @@ class Validator: rules = data['RelationshipRules'] self.skiplist = set([name.lower() for name in data['SkipList']]) self.rules = self.remove_unsupported_rules(rules) - pctgrule = {'RuleIndex':0, - 'TestType':'SingleMetricTest', - 'RangeLower':'0', + pctgrule = {'RuleIndex': 0, + 'TestType': 'SingleMetricTest', + 'RangeLower': '0', 'RangeUpper': '100', 'ErrorThreshold': self.tolerance, - 'Description':'Metrics in percent unit have value with in [0, 100]', + 'Description': 'Metrics in percent unit have value with in [0, 100]', 'Metrics': [{'Name': m.lower()} for m in self.pctgmetrics]} self.rules.append(pctgrule) @@ -469,8 +490,9 @@ class Validator: idx += 1 if self.debug: - #TODO: need to test and generate file name correctly - data = {'RelationshipRules':self.rules, 'SupportedMetrics': [{"MetricName": name} for name in self.metrics]} + # TODO: need to test and generate file name correctly + data = {'RelationshipRules': self.rules, 'SupportedMetrics': [ + {"MetricName": name} for name in self.metrics]} self.json_dump(data, self.fullrulefname) return @@ -482,20 +504,17 @@ class Validator: @param key: key to the dictionaries (index of self.workloads). ''' self.allresults[key] = self.results - self.allignoremetrics[key] = self.ignoremetrics - self.allfailtests[key] = self.failtests self.alltotalcnt[key] = self.totalcnt self.allpassedcnt[key] = self.passedcnt - self.allerrlist[key] = self.errlist - #Initialize data structures before data validation of each workload + # Initialize data structures before data validation of each workload def _init_data(self): - testtypes = ['PositiveValueTest', 'RelationshipTest', 'SingleMetricTest'] + testtypes = ['PositiveValueTest', + 'RelationshipTest', 'SingleMetricTest'] self.results = dict() - self.ignoremetrics= set() + self.ignoremetrics = set() self.errlist = list() - self.failtests = {k:{'Total Tests':0, 'Passed Tests':0, 'Failed Tests':[]} for k in testtypes} self.totalcnt = 0 self.passedcnt = 0 @@ -525,32 +544,33 @@ class Validator: testtype = r['TestType'] if not self.check_rule(testtype, r['Metrics']): continue - if testtype == 'RelationshipTest': + if testtype == 'RelationshipTest': self.relationship_test(r) elif testtype == 'SingleMetricTest': self.single_test(r) else: print("Unsupported Test Type: ", testtype) - self.errlist.append("Unsupported Test Type from rule: " + r['RuleIndex']) - self._storewldata(i) print("Workload: ", self.workloads[i]) - print("Total metrics collected: ", self.failtests['PositiveValueTest']['Total Tests']) - print("Non-negative metric count: ", self.failtests['PositiveValueTest']['Passed Tests']) print("Total Test Count: ", self.totalcnt) print("Passed Test Count: ", self.passedcnt) - + self._storewldata(i) self.create_report() - return sum(self.alltotalcnt.values()) != sum(self.allpassedcnt.values()) + return len(self.errlist) > 0 # End of Class Validator def main() -> None: - parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Launch metric value validation") - - parser.add_argument("-rule", help="Base validation rule file", required=True) - parser.add_argument("-output_dir", help="Path for validator output file, report file", required=True) - parser.add_argument("-debug", help="Debug run, save intermediate data to files", action="store_true", default=False) - parser.add_argument("-wl", help="Workload to run while data collection", default="true") + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( + description="Launch metric value validation") + + parser.add_argument( + "-rule", help="Base validation rule file", required=True) + parser.add_argument( + "-output_dir", help="Path for validator output file, report file", required=True) + parser.add_argument("-debug", help="Debug run, save intermediate data to files", + action="store_true", default=False) + parser.add_argument( + "-wl", help="Workload to run while data collection", default="true") parser.add_argument("-m", help="Metric list to validate", default="") args = parser.parse_args() outpath = Path(args.output_dir) @@ -559,8 +579,8 @@ def main() -> None: datafile = Path.joinpath(outpath, 'perf_data.json') validator = Validator(args.rule, reportf, debug=args.debug, - datafname=datafile, fullrulefname=fullrule, workload=args.wl, - metrics=args.m) + datafname=datafile, fullrulefname=fullrule, workload=args.wl, + metrics=args.m) ret = validator.test() return ret @@ -569,6 +589,3 @@ def main() -> None: if __name__ == "__main__": import sys sys.exit(main()) - - - diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_values.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_values.sh index 7ca172599aa6..279f19c5919a 100755 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_values.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_values.sh @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ echo "Output will be stored in: $tmpdir" $PYTHON $pythonvalidator -rule $rulefile -output_dir $tmpdir -wl "${workload}" ret=$? rm -rf $tmpdir - +if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then + echo "Metric validation return with erros. Please check metrics reported with errors." +fi exit $ret -- 2.42.0