Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 22:54:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 22:54:22 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:7178 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 22:54:09 -0500 Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 04:54:08 +0100 (CET) From: Dave Jones To: Larry McVoy Cc: Alan Cox , Benjamin LaHaise , Oliver Xymoron , Christer Weinigel , Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking In-Reply-To: <20011229184921.B27114@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Larry McVoy wrote: > that people avoid merge conflicts because they hurt, because of > the poor tools. > > "Docter it hurts when I have to merge" > "So don't do that." What I've seen happen quite frequently... developer a: "Hey, here's a patch to do aaaa" maintainer: "Ah, I've already sent Linus a patch to merge changes from developer b in this area, but your changes look ok. can you resync when Linus puts next patch out, and send me the rediffed copy again?" developer: "Sure, no problem". Alternatively its maintainer telling developer a "Ah, I've a bunch of stuff queued from developer b, you guys need to talk on this and work out how to get this stuff working together, get back to me when you've work it out". People management rather than source management systems. Dave. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/