Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-45693-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] dm-raid: fix v6.7 regressions
To: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, heinzm@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com,
 snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
 jbrassow@f14.redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, shli@fb.com, akpm@osdl.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
 yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
References: <20240130021843.3608859-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
 <CALTww29QO5kzmN6Vd+jT=-8W5F52tJjHKSgrfUc1Z1ZAeRKHHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <78016a94-737a-af4d-446b-c9fbef967895@huaweicloud.com>
 <CALTww29UKCJcvJB2BvGTbCcpvD4Y-J+Bg1WgE0nOijLNMv=RGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Message-ID: <6f8ca5f8-c958-8769-1433-a19c4067b074@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:52:31 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALTww29UKCJcvJB2BvGTbCcpvD4Y-J+Bg1WgE0nOijLNMv=RGg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

在 2024/01/31 9:28, Xiao Ni 写道:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 9:25 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Xiao Ni!
>>
>> 在 2024/01/31 8:29, Xiao Ni 写道:
>>> In my environment, the lvm2 regression test has passed. There are only
>>> three failed cases which also fail in kernel 6.6.
>>>
>>> ###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvresize-fs-crypt.sh
>>> ###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/pvck-dump.sh
>>> ###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/select-report.sh
>>> ### 426 tests: 346 passed, 70 skipped, 0 timed out, 7 warned, 3 failed
>>>     in 89:26.073
>>
>> Thanks for the test, this is greate news.
>>
>> Kuai
>>
> 
> Hi Kuai
> 
> Have you run mdadm regression tests based on this patch set?

Of course, I'm runing in my VM with loop devices.

Thanks,
Kuai

> 
> Regards
> Xiao
> 
> .
>