Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-45854-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] dm-raid: fix v6.7 regressions
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, heinzm@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com,
 snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
 jbrassow@f14.redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, shli@fb.com, akpm@osdl.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
 yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
References: <20240130021843.3608859-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
 <CALTww29QO5kzmN6Vd+jT=-8W5F52tJjHKSgrfUc1Z1ZAeRKHHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <78016a94-737a-af4d-446b-c9fbef967895@huaweicloud.com>
 <CALTww29UKCJcvJB2BvGTbCcpvD4Y-J+Bg1WgE0nOijLNMv=RGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <6f8ca5f8-c958-8769-1433-a19c4067b074@huaweicloud.com>
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Message-ID: <08300170-aa41-79d1-09b4-a5c9f006007c@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:06:22 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6f8ca5f8-c958-8769-1433-a19c4067b074@huaweicloud.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

在 2024/01/31 10:52, Yu Kuai 写道:
> Hi,
> 
> 在 2024/01/31 9:28, Xiao Ni 写道:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 9:25 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Xiao Ni!
>>>
>>> 在 2024/01/31 8:29, Xiao Ni 写道:
>>>> In my environment, the lvm2 regression test has passed. There are only
>>>> three failed cases which also fail in kernel 6.6.
>>>>
>>>> ###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvresize-fs-crypt.sh
>>>> ###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/pvck-dump.sh
>>>> ###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/select-report.sh
>>>> ### 426 tests: 346 passed, 70 skipped, 0 timed out, 7 warned, 3 failed
>>>>     in 89:26.073
>>>
>>> Thanks for the test, this is greate news.
>>>
>>> Kuai
>>>
>>
>> Hi Kuai
>>
>> Have you run mdadm regression tests based on this patch set?

BTW, I just make sure there are no new failed tests, however, there
looks like some tests are broken. For example:

04update-metadata:

++ /root/mdadm/mdadm --quiet -CR --assume-clean -e 0.90 /dev/md0 --level 
linear -n 4 -c 64 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 --auto=yes
++ rv=1
++ case $* in
++ cat /var/tmp/stderr
mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Invalid argument

04r1update:

++ /root/mdadm/mdadm --quiet -A /dev/md0 -U resync /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1
++ rv=1
++ case $* in
++ cat /var/tmp/stderr
mdadm: --update=resync not understood for 1.x metadata

Thanks,
Kuai

> 
> Of course, I'm runing in my VM with loop devices.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kuai
> 
>>
>> Regards
>> Xiao
>>
>> .
>>
> 
> .
>