Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:04:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:04:12 -0500 Received: from [209.143.110.29] ([209.143.110.29]:17673 "HELO mail.the-rileys.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:04:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3A1AEA47.ECF2D50A@the-rileys.net> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:34:08 -0500 From: David Riley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Lang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Lang wrote: > > David, usually when it turns out that Linux finds hardware problems the > underlying cause is that linux makes more effective use of the component, > and as such something that was marginal under windows fails under linux as > the correct timing is used. This is true. What I suppose would be the solution is that if faulty hardware is found, a reduction in performance should be made. This is already the case for things like broken PCI BIOS where one can either set the initialization to work a different way or try to make the machine autodetect it. I certainly approve of more effective use of any given component, but sometimes I think it's better to offer the user a choice in the case of faulty hardware. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/