Received: by 2002:a05:7412:d1aa:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id ba42csp1803577rdb; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:27:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHy4c/QeYpEPdYPKhRgK8Jxk831I/iWKZc7w0efmJNRiJobP+NeqWBLon8mN4dOPKwf2QLg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c812:b0:a35:e9a0:c528 with SMTP id cx18-20020a170906c81200b00a35e9a0c528mr1554935ejb.53.1706722044433; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:27:24 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV0rV4CPZ1zAK1UfvZL19ncuoI9/CaTyHq4LWRLN+Mkix0z9SUJ2Dz3B7pu1Dtvp3x9ZaKFEEE8FnbGGeS5OnEOHAuUUZyMphZVssgBcQ== Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x19-20020a1709064a9300b00a3685db6737si608167eju.245.2024.01.31.09.27.24 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-46892-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.s=default header.b=LcmtWHym; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-46892-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-46892-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F8B1F2B110 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5495D12F580; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="LcmtWHym" Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2AF12C553 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.132 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706721479; cv=none; b=mCbKWDzeGhVsS9THsK9bnftiZw0G1EzdkAhFVZ17xkWLBUHcDwvdySSRfvcyDvmz+au4n/Fl8mcJIt1ODT9t91Ok9j5CloG5OaL/UXDnoPI1sntBSphYJYMpAR+zmENcSN6FDALQu6RTbjDvVxZjwYgtmdwNcAHkipR7WwlGfps= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706721479; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9nkrtbjByfNv1T6sAC22Fmx80l4zZlQsOYlq646IIRE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=e4Oo31D7/uP8QE9W8mL/9ZLNAr/VDeXqQcQ1eR8GSigOFjKEsOoDsflrgoyiz5rXZyVUetFubU0vdmA42GS2D2gdlVHM4T0/I2a974CKHchNIJLjGUnyWhZ77ke8OFvT0vqM1gHVzop92URto0AiQoAjpSdc2bDk2zN93p2WTyY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=LcmtWHym; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.132 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1706721468; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=4dRcMznKsMkWtxs3KkZc5kx2bNGWIJtSaincuWHLRCY=; b=LcmtWHymEvwR6EUSIQ7KJqCtOlMgefesEkqHeRKeZQacTzUwgwelZ4TdD+1j0VTT41V4e9fE1oM2wRoKwIW1dO/ssWWXZQXgC5O2xjfrbbG4GdICY9QB+95I3qQIjhVFTir8HsImxfCqQXoRHXY2TXTHp1oCXkgwycO0UT1ufSk= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R141e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045170;MF=yaoma@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W.kJfVI_1706721466; Received: from localhost.localdomain(mailfrom:yaoma@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W.kJfVI_1706721466) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 01:17:48 +0800 From: Bitao Hu To: dianders@chromium.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pmladek@suse.com, kernelfans@gmail.com, liusong@linux.alibaba.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yaoma@linux.alibaba.com Subject: [PATCHv3 2/2] watchdog/softlockup: report the most frequent interrupts Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 01:17:38 +0800 Message-Id: <20240131171738.35496-3-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1) In-Reply-To: <20240131171738.35496-1-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20240131171738.35496-1-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit When the watchdog determines that the current soft lockup is due to an interrupt storm based on CPU utilization, reporting the most frequent interrupts could be good enough for further troubleshooting. Below is an example of interrupt storm. The call tree does not provide useful information, but we can analyze which interrupt caused the soft lockup by comparing the counts of interrupts. [ 2987.488075] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 23s! [kworker/9:1:214] [ 2987.488607] CPU#9 Utilization every 4s during lockup: [ 2987.488941] #1: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 2987.489357] #2: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 2987.489771] #3: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 2987.490186] #4: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 2987.490601] #5: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 2987.491034] CPU#9 Detect HardIRQ Time exceeds 50%. Most frequent HardIRQs: [ 2987.491493] #1: 330985 irq#7(IPI) [ 2987.491743] #2: 5000 irq#10(arch_timer) [ 2987.492039] #3: 9 irq#91(nvme0q2) [ 2987.492318] #4: 3 irq#118(virtio1-output.12) .. [ 2987.492728] Call trace: [ 2987.492729] __do_softirq+0xa8/0x364 Signed-off-by: Bitao Hu --- kernel/watchdog.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 156 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c index 046507be4eb5..c4c25f25eae7 100644 --- a/kernel/watchdog.c +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ #include #include #include +#include +#include +#include #include #include @@ -431,11 +434,15 @@ void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void) __this_cpu_write(watchdog_report_ts, SOFTLOCKUP_DELAY_REPORT); } +static void set_potential_softlockup(unsigned long now, unsigned long touch_ts); + static int is_softlockup(unsigned long touch_ts, unsigned long period_ts, unsigned long now) { if ((watchdog_enabled & WATCHDOG_SOFTOCKUP_ENABLED) && watchdog_thresh) { + /* Softlockup may occur in the current period */ + set_potential_softlockup(now, period_ts); /* Warn about unreasonable delays. */ if (time_after(now, period_ts + get_softlockup_thresh())) return now - touch_ts; @@ -462,6 +469,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u16, cpustat_old[NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP]); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, cpustat_utilization[NUM_STATS_GROUPS][NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP]); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, cpustat_tail); +static void print_hardirq_counts(void); + /* * We don't need nanosecond resolution. A granularity of 16ms is * sufficient for our precision, allowing us to use u16 to store @@ -516,10 +525,156 @@ static void print_cpustat(void) __this_cpu_read(cpustat_utilization[i][STATS_HARDIRQ]), __this_cpu_read(cpustat_utilization[i][STATS_IDLE])); } + print_hardirq_counts(); +} + +#define HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH 50 +#define NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT 5 +static DECLARE_BITMAP(softlockup_hardirq_cpus, CONFIG_NR_CPUS); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u32 *, hardirq_counts); + +struct irq_counts { + int irq; + u32 counts; +}; + +static void find_counts_top(struct irq_counts *irq_counts, int irq, u32 counts, int range) +{ + unsigned int i, j; + + for (i = 0; i < range; i++) { + if (counts > irq_counts[i].counts) { + for (j = range - 1; j > i; j--) { + irq_counts[j].counts = irq_counts[j - 1].counts; + irq_counts[j].irq = irq_counts[j - 1].irq; + } + irq_counts[j].counts = counts; + irq_counts[j].irq = irq; + break; + } + } +} + +/* + * If the proportion of time spent handling irq exceeds HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH% + * during sample_period, then it is necessary to record the counts of each irq. + */ +static inline bool need_record_irq_counts(int type) +{ + int tail = __this_cpu_read(cpustat_tail); + u8 utilization; + + if (--tail == -1) + tail = 4; + utilization = __this_cpu_read(cpustat_utilization[tail][type]); + return utilization > HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH; +} + +/* + * Mark softlockup as potentially caused by hardirq + */ +static void set_potential_softlockup_hardirq(void) +{ + u32 i; + u32 *counts = __this_cpu_read(hardirq_counts); + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + struct irq_desc *desc; + + if (!need_record_irq_counts(STATS_HARDIRQ)) + return; + + if (!test_bit(cpu, softlockup_hardirq_cpus)) { + counts = kmalloc_array(nr_irqs, sizeof(u32), GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!counts) + return; + for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) { + if (!desc) + continue; + counts[i] = desc->kstat_irqs ? + *this_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs) : 0; + } + __this_cpu_write(hardirq_counts, counts); + set_bit(cpu, softlockup_hardirq_cpus); + } +} + +static void clear_potential_softlockup_hardirq(void) +{ + u32 *counts = __this_cpu_read(hardirq_counts); + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + + if (test_bit(cpu, softlockup_hardirq_cpus)) { + kfree(counts); + counts = NULL; + __this_cpu_write(hardirq_counts, counts); + clear_bit(cpu, softlockup_hardirq_cpus); + } } + +/* + * Mark that softlockup may occur + */ +static void set_potential_softlockup(unsigned long now, unsigned long period_ts) +{ + if (time_after_eq(now, period_ts + get_softlockup_thresh() / 5)) + set_potential_softlockup_hardirq(); +} + +static void clear_potential_softlockup(void) +{ + clear_potential_softlockup_hardirq(); +} + +static void print_hardirq_counts(void) +{ + u32 i; + struct irq_desc *desc; + u32 counts_diff; + u32 *counts = __this_cpu_read(hardirq_counts); + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + struct irq_counts hardirq_counts_top[NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT] = { + {-1, 0}, {-1, 0}, {-1, 0}, {-1, 0}, + }; + + if (test_bit(cpu, softlockup_hardirq_cpus)) { + /* Find the top NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT most frequent interrupts */ + for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) { + if (!desc) + continue; + counts_diff = desc->kstat_irqs ? + *this_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs) - counts[i] : 0; + find_counts_top(hardirq_counts_top, i, counts_diff, + NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT); + } + /* + * We do not want the "watchdog: " prefix on every line, + * hence we use "printk" instead of "pr_crit". + */ + printk(KERN_CRIT "CPU#%d Detect HardIRQ Time exceeds %d%%. Most frequent HardIRQs:\n", + smp_processor_id(), HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH); + for (i = 0; i < NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT; i++) { + if (hardirq_counts_top[i].irq == -1) + break; + desc = irq_to_desc(hardirq_counts_top[i].irq); + if (desc && desc->action) + printk(KERN_CRIT "\t#%u: %-10u\tirq#%d(%s)\n", + i+1, hardirq_counts_top[i].counts, + hardirq_counts_top[i].irq, desc->action->name); + else + printk(KERN_CRIT "\t#%u: %-10u\tirq#%d\n", + i+1, hardirq_counts_top[i].counts, + hardirq_counts_top[i].irq); + } + if (!need_record_irq_counts(STATS_HARDIRQ)) + clear_potential_softlockup_hardirq(); + } +} + #else static inline void update_cpustat(void) { } static inline void print_cpustat(void) { } +static inline void set_potential_softlockup(unsigned long now, unsigned long period_ts) { } +static inline void clear_potential_softlockup(void) { } #endif /* watchdog detector functions */ @@ -537,6 +692,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stop_work, softlockup_stop_work); static int softlockup_fn(void *data) { update_touch_ts(); + clear_potential_softlockup(); complete(this_cpu_ptr(&softlockup_completion)); return 0; -- 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)