Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-47497-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:28:25 -0500
From: Aren <aren@peacevolution.org>
To: Jernej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0krabec?= <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Miles Alan <m@milesalan.com>, 
	Ondrej Jirman <megi@xff.cz>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, 
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 
	linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: sun50i-a64-pinephone: add multicolor led
 node
Message-ID: <k26bellccok4tj3kz2nrtp2vth2rnsiea677e2kzm56m767wjx@pnkqiz5hmiyb>
References: <20240128204740.2355092-1-aren@peacevolution.org>
 <20240128204740.2355092-3-aren@peacevolution.org>
 <4864457.GXAFRqVoOG@jernej-laptop>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4864457.GXAFRqVoOG@jernej-laptop>

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:41:14PM +0100, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> Dne nedelja, 28. januar 2024 ob 21:45:09 CET je Aren Moynihan napisal(a):
> > The red, green, and blue leds currently in the device tree represent a
> > single rgb led on the front of the PinePhone.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Aren Moynihan <aren@peacevolution.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >  .../boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi    | 13 ++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi
> > index ad2476ee01e4..6eab61a12cd8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi
> > @@ -39,21 +39,21 @@ chosen {
> >  	leds {
> >  		compatible = "gpio-leds";
> >  
> > -		led-0 {
> > +		led0: led-0 {
> >  			function = LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR;
> >  			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
> >  			gpios = <&pio 3 20 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PD20 */
> >  			retain-state-suspended;
> >  		};
> >  
> > -		led-1 {
> > +		led1: led-1 {
> >  			function = LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR;
> >  			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
> >  			gpios = <&pio 3 18 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PD18 */
> >  			retain-state-suspended;
> >  		};
> >  
> > -		led-2 {
> > +		led2: led-2 {
> >  			function = LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR;
> >  			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
> >  			gpios = <&pio 3 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PD19 */
> > @@ -61,6 +61,13 @@ led-2 {
> >  		};
> >  	};
> >  
> > +	multi-led {
> > +		compatible = "leds-group-multicolor";
> > +		color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RGB>;
> > +		function = LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR;
> 
> Does it make sense to have function specified here and above? Example
> specifies it only in multi-led node.

I'm not sure it makes much of a difference, besides perhaps confusing
userspace. From what I can tell the only thing it'll change is the name
of the directory in sysfs from "<color>:status" to "<color>:". I'll
change this in v2 unless anyone has a reason not to.

Thanks
 - Aren

> Best regards,
> Jernej
> 
> > +		leds = <&led0>, <&led1>, <&led2>;
> > +	};
> > +
> >  	reg_ps: ps-regulator {
> >  		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> >  		regulator-name = "ps";