Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-48135-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <a163702b-40f9-4082-a4d1-d89de645a651@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 20:27:17 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: aim300: add AIM300 AIoT
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        <andersson@kernel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        <conor+dt@kernel.org>, <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@quicinc.com>,
        Qiang Yu
	<quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>,
        Ziyue Zhang <quic_ziyuzhan@quicinc.com>
References: <20240119100621.11788-1-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
 <20240119100621.11788-7-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
 <d3ef45cf-2de8-4f5b-8857-62d1996f3f58@linaro.org>
 <842bf6ad-46e1-43d8-86be-79ab0f49710b@quicinc.com>
 <c17dafd2-db89-4fe2-8e98-2a031f7237c2@quicinc.com>
 <b28904a6-c1ef-44b5-96ca-313a9a2a3f8b@quicinc.com>
 <3e3cbc36-2f3f-4295-9325-90757f0d77ce@linaro.org>
 <012bb387-2472-4bcb-ba87-3bf75dd88d64@quicinc.com>
 <5c6fec5f-79ed-4c93-b337-68a2c25d8a44@linaro.org>
From: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <5c6fec5f-79ed-4c93-b337-68a2c25d8a44@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 2/1/2024 8:20 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/02/2024 13:16, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/1/2024 8:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 01/02/2024 12:49, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>>>>> This should be probably TX SWR_INPUT1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will double check this with related team and I will update this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I will apply "TX SWR_INPUT1" on audio-routing node in the next patch
>>>>> series.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This patch series has been sent for nearly two weeks. do you think it is
>>>> better to modify the patch series acording to the current comments and
>>>> submit a new patch series, or continue to wait for your review comments
>>>> on the current path series?
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Whom do you ask?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>
>> Sorry Krzysztof, can you give sone guidance on whether I should update
>> patch and submit a new patch series, or do you need time to review
>> current patch series?
> 
> Up to you, I do not plan to provide more reviews on this. I just
> commented about this thing here, because I was doing similar work for QRD.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Thank youfor clarification.

Next I will update patches according to the current comments and submit 
a new path series.

-- 
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan