Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756008AbXLSVQ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:16:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752627AbXLSVQU (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:16:20 -0500 Received: from sovereign.computergmbh.de ([85.214.69.204]:57306 "EHLO sovereign.computergmbh.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750846AbXLSVQU (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:16:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:16:19 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" cc: Linux kernel Subject: Re: Trying to convert old modules to newer kernels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 694 Lines: 24 On Dec 19 2007 16:10, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: >> I anticipate the day removing __init causes a breakage, heh. >> I mean, if all in-tree modules and LDD3 use it, it can't be wrong, can it? >> >>> plus got rid of all the code! >>> static int32_t startup() >> >> I noticed that. Where's your "void" gone? :-) > >What void??? > static __init int startup(void) { ... } Just a stylistic thing, but it has got a clear semantic difference to (). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/