Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-48693-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240125013858.3986-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
 <20240125013858.3986-4-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> <170678377409.179918.13077326172475089482.b4-ty@linaro.org>
 <4c2c425b-3ddd-4484-98cf-3f7768c94e82@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <4c2c425b-3ddd-4484-98cf-3f7768c94e82@linaro.org>
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 12:24:25 -0600
Message-ID: <CAPLW+4=wsR=V+6vctf0gMzFVg6havL-M0kTDLLwhr-XdfuCD5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SPI nodes for Exynos850
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>, 
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>, 
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>, 
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:56=E2=80=AFAM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 01/02/2024 11:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:38:58 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> >> Some USI blocks can be configured as SPI controllers. Add correspondin=
g
> >> SPI nodes to Exynos850 SoC device tree.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SPI nodes for Exynos850
> >       https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/98473b0d78caa5502b7eee05553ee=
168f0b0b424
>
> And dropped. You did not test it.
>

Right. Forgot to re-test it after re-shuffling the clocks. Sorry for
the hustle, I'll send v3 shortly.

> For some time, all Samsung SoCs and its variants are expected not to
> introduce any new `dtbs_check W=3D1` warnings. Several platforms, like al=
l
> ARM64 Samsung SoCs, have already zero warnings, thus for such platforms
> it is extra easy for the submitter to validate DTS before posting a
> patch. The patch briefly looks like it is not conforming to this rule.
> Please confirm that you tested your patch and it does not introduce any
> new warnings (linux-next is decisive here).
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>