Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-48715-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 18:40:49 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>,
	"wg@grandegger.com" <wg@grandegger.com>,
	"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatible
 string
Message-ID: <20240201-relish-glacial-a73532d3e8c6@spud>
References: <20240122091738.2078746-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
 <20240122-skilled-wimp-4bc1769bf235-mkl@pengutronix.de>
 <20240122125631.4c54eba1@kernel.org>
 <DU0PR04MB941750744E86A1656009B7BE88742@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <20240131145736.GA1262278-robh@kernel.org>
 <DU0PR04MB94178632D6F774339FB13375887C2@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XxIjggpR5LQGNVIU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DU0PR04MB94178632D6F774339FB13375887C2@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>


--XxIjggpR5LQGNVIU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 11:22:49PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatib=
le
> > string
> >=20
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 07:00:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95
> > > > compatible string
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:26:25 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > > > > > Add i.MX95 flexcan which is compatible i.MX93 flexcan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> > > >
> > > > Hm, you don't apply CAN DTB patches?
> > >
> > > Nope. I am preparing dt-binding first, then post the i.MX95 SoC dtsi.
> > > The CAN will be in the i.MX95 SOC dtsi file, not a single patch only
> > > for CAN node.
> >=20
> > The question was why isn't Marc, the CAN maintainer, applying this. I h=
ave
> > the same question.
>=20
> That's fine, let's drop this patch, the CAN node will not be put in my so=
c dtsi
> patch file, it will be in a separate patchset with some i.MX95 patches.

I am confused. This patch (for the binding) needs to be applied
regardless of what you are doing with your soc dtsi file.

--XxIjggpR5LQGNVIU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZbvlsQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0lKXAQD9Q4v0VDU/Dyun0tgqIB2JBr3Fh9ja/fUDKvmCx66YyQD/cqPjogSsgjOw
SCCzaqrgXBrwCRCJNuBV6lywKxI1ngc=
=L85i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XxIjggpR5LQGNVIU--