Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-48515-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 18:22:20 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pcmcia: Convert to use less arguments in
 pci_bus_for_each_resource()
Message-ID: <ZbvFPM0jQYFXZhHA@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20231030115053.2752588-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <Zbu19xfahgI_dKLt@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <ZbvEhVw-k7UT7Wpm@owl.dominikbrodowski.net>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZbvEhVw-k7UT7Wpm@owl.dominikbrodowski.net>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:19:17PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Am Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:17:11PM +0200 schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 01:50:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > The pci_bus_for_each_resource() can hide the iterator loop since
> > > it may be not used otherwise. With this, we may drop that iterator
> > > variable definition.
> > 
> > Can it be now applied?
> 
> Which tree will this go through? No need to involve the PCMCIA tree, and you
> already have my ACK...

I believe PCI one, okay, seems like I have to resend with Bjorn being included.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko