Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-48949-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 16:36:15 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Dharma.B@microchip.com
Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, bbrezillon@kernel.org,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
	tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
	claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lee@kernel.org,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Hari.PrasathGE@microchip.com,
	Manikandan.M@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [linux][PATCH v5 0/3] Convert Microchip's HLCDC Text based DT
 bindings to JSON schema
Message-ID: <20240201223615.GA1726520-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20240131033523.577450-1-dharma.b@microchip.com>
 <478cab42-5f30-4fbe-b42d-02d16b81ca11@microchip.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <478cab42-5f30-4fbe-b42d-02d16b81ca11@microchip.com>

On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 03:38:37AM +0000, Dharma.B@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On 31/01/24 9:05 am, Dharma B - I70843 wrote:
> > Converted the text bindings to YAML and validated them individually using following commands
> > 
> > $ make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > $ make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > 
> > changelogs are available in respective patches.
> > 
> > As Sam suggested I'm sending the PWM binding as it is in this patch series, clean up patch
> > will be sent as separate patch.
> > 
> 
> I would want to know if I can have the examples in display and pwm 
> bindings separately or if I have to delete them from both and have a 
> single, comprehensive example in mfd binding. I'm a little puzzled about 
> this.

The strong preference is 1 complete example in the MFD binding. That 
avoids 2 copies of the same thing, issues with incomplete examples, 
and temporary warnings bisecting the series.

Rob