Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-49390-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 08:55:47 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Bo Liu <liubo03@inspur.com>
Cc: <alex.aring@gmail.com>, <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>,
 <davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
 <pabeni@redhat.com>, <linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org>,
 <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ieee802154: at86rf230: convert to use maple tree
 register cache
Message-ID: <20240202085547.46c81c96@xps-13>
In-Reply-To: <20240202064512.39259-1-liubo03@inspur.com>
References: <20240202064512.39259-1-liubo03@inspur.com>
Organization: Bootlin
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Bo,

liubo03@inspur.com wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 01:45:12 -0500:

> The maple tree register cache is based on a much more modern data structu=
re
> than the rbtree cache and makes optimisation choices which are probably
> more appropriate for modern systems than those made by the rbtree cache.

What are the real intended benefits? Shall we expect any drawbacks?

> Signed-off-by: Bo Liu <liubo03@inspur.com>

Thanks,
Miqu=C3=A8l