Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-49573-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240131035535.22258-1-liangchen.linux@gmail.com> <CACGkMEuaGiH4H3pvjTK5rUh0DmL9ZMsLRaVQ3+5GOfnrj8OxPA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEuaGiH4H3pvjTK5rUh0DmL9ZMsLRaVQ3+5GOfnrj8OxPA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:25:02 +0800
Message-ID: <CAKhg4tL3E_AfsEOyzUr13zcbjzzUY1v5VXdAGMLDYdy5om35NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] virtio_net: Support RX hash XDP hint
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, hengqi@linux.alibaba.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, 
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:37=E2=80=AFPM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wro=
te:
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 11:55=E2=80=AFAM Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmai=
l.com> wrote:
> >
> > The RSS hash report is a feature that's part of the virtio specificatio=
n.
> > Currently, virtio backends like qemu, vdpa (mlx5), and potentially vhos=
t
> > (still a work in progress as per [1]) support this feature. While the
> > capability to obtain the RSS hash has been enabled in the normal path,
> > it's currently missing in the XDP path. Therefore, we are introducing
> > XDP hints through kfuncs to allow XDP programs to access the RSS hash.
> >
> > 1.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231015141644.260646-1-akihiko.odaki@dayni=
x.com/#r
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks

I've just realized that I forgot to include netdev@vger.kernel.org in
the cc list. Would it be advisable for me to resend the patch with
netdev@vger.kernel.org in the cc list to ensure it receives the
necessary attention for potential merging? Thanks!

Thanks,
Liang
>