Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-49682-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
From: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
To: x86@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	houtao1@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 0/3] Fix the read of vsyscall page through bpf
Date: Fri,  2 Feb 2024 18:39:32 +0800
Message-Id: <20240202103935.3154011-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Hi,

As reported by syzboot [1] and [2], when trying to read vsyscall page
by using bpf_probe_read_kernel() or bpf_probe_read(), oops may happen.

Thomas Gleixner had proposed a test patch [3], but it seems that no
formal patch is posted after about one month [4], so I post it instead
and add an Originally-by tag in patch #2.

Patch #1 makes is_vsyscall_vaddr() being a common helper. Patch #2 fixes
the problem by disallowing vsyscall page read for
copy_from_kernel_nofault(). Patch #3 adds one test case to ensure the
read of vsyscall page through bpf is rejected. Please see individual
patches for more details.

Comments are always welcome.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAG48ez06TZft=ATH1qh2c5mpS5BT8UakwNkzi6nvK5_djC-4Nw@mail.gmail.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABOYnLynjBoFZOf3Z4BhaZkc5hx_kHfsjiW+UWLoB=w33LvScw@mail.gmail.com/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87r0jwquhv.ffs@tglx/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e24b125c-8ff4-9031-6c53-67ff2e01f316@huaweicloud.com/

Change Log:
v3:
 * rephrase commit message for patch #1 & #2 (Sohil)
 * reword comments in copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed() (Sohil)
 * add Rvb tag for patch #1 and Acked-by tag for patch #3 (Sohil, Yonghong)

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240126115423.3943360-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/
  * move is_vsyscall_vaddr to asm/vsyscall.h instead (Sohil)
  * elaborate on the reason for disallowing of vsyscall page read in
    copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed() (Sohil)
  * update the commit message of patch #2 to more clearly explain how
    the oops occurs. (Sohil)
  * update the commit message of patch #3 to explain the expected return
    values of various bpf helpers (Yonghong)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240119073019.1528573-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/

Hou Tao (3):
  x86/mm: Move is_vsyscall_vaddr() into asm/vsyscall.h
  x86/mm: Disallow vsyscall page read for copy_from_kernel_nofault()
  selftest/bpf: Test the read of vsyscall page under x86-64

 arch/x86/include/asm/vsyscall.h               | 10 ++++
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c                           |  9 ---
 arch/x86/mm/maccess.c                         | 10 ++++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/read_vsyscall.c  | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/read_vsyscall.c       | 45 +++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/read_vsyscall.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_vsyscall.c

-- 
2.29.2