Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-49761-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
  ath11k@lists.infradead.org,  linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [regression] ath11k broken in v6.7
References: <874jfjiolh.fsf@kernel.org> <87frytg7b8.fsf@kernel.org>
	<878r4lg3t8.fsf@kernel.org> <87jzo13jmf.fsf@kernel.org>
	<94150b26-bdd9-49c2-82a1-26ff46c9d32a@leemhuis.info>
	<87fryp3he0.fsf@kernel.org>
	<0253854a-e5f9-4316-bec3-61aaf3ebfd1a@leemhuis.info>
	<871qa0xtk6.fsf@kernel.org>
	<ccbb3aeb-daa1-49ba-b729-964bd97748bc@leemhuis.info>
	<87r0hvta9a.fsf@kernel.org>
	<0c8e379b-91fa-4e02-8758-aeee01024c93@leemhuis.info>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 13:34:37 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0c8e379b-91fa-4e02-8758-aeee01024c93@leemhuis.info> (Linux
	regression tracking's message of "Fri, 2 Feb 2024 12:29:11 +0100")
Message-ID: <87mssjt7zm.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@leemhuis.info> writes:
>> One more question, I promise it's the last one :) When using the Closes
>> tag in patches does it matter which URL is used, either the original or
>> the duplicate? For example, do these both tags close the issue:
>> 
>> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325423423423542
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/not_relevant/msgid-423423423423423423/
>
> Yes, you can use either or both of them together to make regzbot close a
> issue and it's duplicates. But to make Linus happy I guess he'd prefer
> to have both links in there, if those are reports from different people
> that contain background information that might sooner or later be handy
> to have at hand.

Good point, I didn't consider that. I think I have now a good grasp of
regzbot and I'll try to use it actively from now on. Good luck for the
rewrite, I hope you get it finished soon.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches