Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-49985-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 07:06:09 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] net: dqs: NIC stall detector
Message-ID: <Zb0E4RQzoNDGL2AE@gmail.com>
References: <20240131102150.728960-1-leitao@debian.org>
 <20240201081432.3fa70c6c@kernel.org>
 <ZbvnTNT28EpoGSdU@gmail.com>
 <20240201114318.72eb52e1@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240201114318.72eb52e1@kernel.org>

On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 11:43:18AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:47:40 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > Let me take this on in, but the other one is not a fix,
> > > so it has to go to net-next.  
> > 
> > Sure. I didn't know how to split the dependencies. Maybe I should have
> > sent both of them to net-next, and you would cherry-pick the fix to net?
> > Is this a better approach for next time?
> 
> You gotta send the net part and then wait until Thu afternoon Pacific
> time when Linus pulls from us. We then pull net (and Linus's tree into
> net-next).

Thanks for the clarification. I will wait for that before sending the
second patch against net-next.