Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-50161-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:40:54 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Cc: wim@linux-watchdog.org, linux@roeck-us.net, robh@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, geert+renesas@glider.be,
	magnus.damm@gmail.com, biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] dt-bindings: watchdog: renesas,wdt: Document
 RZ/G3S support
Message-ID: <20240202-bacteria-genre-aeb373023f4b@spud>
References: <20240202075849.3422380-1-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
 <20240202075849.3422380-9-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U8/7lj7TDOE26hKX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240202075849.3422380-9-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>


--U8/7lj7TDOE26hKX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 09:58:49AM +0200, Claudiu wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>=20
> Document the support for the watchdog IP available on RZ/G3S SoC. The
> watchdog IP available on RZ/G3S SoC is identical to the one found on
> RZ/G2L SoC.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
>=20
> Changes in v3:
> - re-arranged the tags as my b4 am/shazam placed previously the
>   Ab, Rb tags before the author's Sob

What's wrong with that?
You resent the patch, so I don't think there's any chain of custody
issues there.

Cheers,
Conor.

--U8/7lj7TDOE26hKX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZb0bFgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0g5pAQCpkJOLa7E3TMp29A7DxaBnGTGsPkm5uwCA2OaeQC4RLgD+Jj74655Uch/a
nzQ+5VvEpBzzO/dpERfeOJ+4Urn40Qw=
=VZJS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--U8/7lj7TDOE26hKX--