Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-51036-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 12:25:26 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@google.com>,
	Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>,
	Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>,
	Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Adam Dunlap <acdunlap@google.com>,
	Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	Sidharth Telang <sidtelang@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86: enforce and cleanup RIP-relative accesses in
 early boot code
Message-ID: <20240203112526.GGZb4iphr6YR5f5QNf@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240121182040.GBZa1geI5NxWSslvt0@fat_crate.local>
 <20240130220845.1978329-1-kevinloughlin@google.com>
 <20240131140037.GDZbpShX2b0elXlqDA@fat_crate.local>
 <CAJ5mJ6j-Vw2P=QLK-J_J79S35UggvZPtm5sia74=enR1qq9X9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240131182944.GJZbqRmBN_KDgK_nmB@fat_crate.local>
 <CAGdbjmJgu4euOTEzns4-7pqUWo8n-gNJiAfARoZWxw8T252zJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240203101927.GEZb4TL2H3XTqCSo5d@fat_crate.local>
 <CAMj1kXGh9pw0U=+-Pg8Uh4xzNhyDZBDvGC7jcnCYvmTQxaUZTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXGh9pw0U=+-Pg8Uh4xzNhyDZBDvGC7jcnCYvmTQxaUZTQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 11:27:19AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The minimal fix doesn't look that bad IMHO. Note that this version is
> based on your patch that removes
> CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE_BY_DEFAULT, and we'd need to see whether
> or not to backport that as well.

Ok, please send it formally so that I can take a look.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette