Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760649AbXLTNdR (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:33:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753568AbXLTNdI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:33:08 -0500 Received: from styx.suse.cz ([82.119.242.94]:39476 "EHLO duck.suse.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753286AbXLTNdF (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:33:05 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:33:04 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Marcin Slusarz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Fennema Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] udf: fix signedness issue Message-ID: <20071220133304.GC9125@duck.suse.cz> References: <20071216021556.GF26986@joi> <20071217163216.GI6979@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20071219192707.GA18305@joi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071219192707.GA18305@joi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1851 Lines: 38 On Wed 19-12-07 20:27:20, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:32:17PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > sparse generated: > > > fs/udf/namei.c:896:15: originally declared here > > > fs/udf/namei.c:1147:41: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) > > > fs/udf/namei.c:1147:41: expected int *offset > > > fs/udf/namei.c:1147:41: got unsigned int * > > > fs/udf/namei.c:1152:78: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) > > > fs/udf/namei.c:1152:78: expected int *offset > > > fs/udf/namei.c:1152:78: got unsigned int * > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz > > I don't think this is right. udf_get_fileident() should take "unsigned > > int *" as an offset, not just "int". This means changing struct > > udf_fileident_bh to use unsigned int too but that is better anyway. > > And BTW the type shouldn't be uint32_t but really unsigned int in > > udf_rename (int needn't have 32 bits on all archs (although I think it > > has currently)). > That would be hard. Look what is happening with soffset and eoffset > eg in udf_fileident_read() - these fields are used as signed ints. Doh, you're right. soffset can go below 0. OK, then your patch is fine. You can add there Acked-by: Jan Kara BTW: If you haven't got an email from Andrew about accepting the patches we agreed upon, then please resend the patches to him (with additional Acked-by: Jan Kara and CC me) so that they don't get lost. Thanks. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/