Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765190AbXLTPPa (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:15:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758137AbXLTPPP (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:15:15 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:39349 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753398AbXLTPPN (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:15:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:14:49 -0500 From: Theodore Tso To: Natalie Protasevich Cc: Matthew Wilcox , James Bottomley , Filippos Papadopoulos , Boaz Harrosh , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: INITIO scsi driver fails to work properly Message-ID: <20071220151449.GA27081@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Natalie Protasevich , Matthew Wilcox , James Bottomley , Filippos Papadopoulos , Boaz Harrosh , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org References: <9f00bd9d0712170139q1397af5fp3c855a2b94726227@mail.gmail.com> <20071217031841.f483e5ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <9f00bd9d0712170341u7fef1fc9pc9986dda1a0475cb@mail.gmail.com> <47666904.8060605@panasas.com> <9f00bd9d0712190048g60d79ma067ba85b5553459@mail.gmail.com> <20071219132918.GB26272@parisc-linux.org> <1198083040.5487.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071219170542.GC26272@parisc-linux.org> <32209efe0712200132k68ba2b40gf6e3a103c216e57@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32209efe0712200132k68ba2b40gf6e3a103c216e57@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1872 Lines: 38 On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 01:32:02AM -0800, Natalie Protasevich wrote: > > The problem is that it appears to the casual observer as if they can > > then add information to the bug through the web interface. But that > > information will never be forwarded to the mailing list. Unless there's > > a way of marking bugs as 'unchangable through the web interface' or 'all > > messages appended to this bug need to be forwarded', Bugzilla just > > doesn't fit our needs. > > > > The Debian BTS fits our way of working much better. Perhaps somebody > > should investigate a migration. > > This is excellent observation by Matthew and James. There is no magic > in bugzilla not being loved, it is just "not the right set of features > for effective work on a problem". It doesn't support multiple > developer' collaboration well. Actually, Bugzilla *could* be configured so that, say, linux-scsi was copied for all SCSI bugs (linux-scsi could just be added to the cc list). The problem though is that Bugzilla will then proceed to cc linux-scsi for all the Bugzilla state change details which might annoy the denizens of the linux-scsi list. But if new entries on the Bugzilla entry could be set to forward to the appropriate mailing list with the messaging *looking* a lot more like a mail message, I suspect it could be acceptable. One of the advantages of the Debian BTS is that it's much more integrated into the e-mail workflow. (Although it lacks the roll up and reporting capabilities that are beloved by managers...) But hey, it could be worse. We could have chosen the Sourceforge bug tracker. :-) - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/