Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937902AbXLTRl1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:41:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S937241AbXLTRkx (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:40:53 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41756 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937039AbXLTRkv (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:40:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:42:15 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: perex@perex.cz Cc: Theodore Tso , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Roland Dreier Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 In-Reply-To: References: <200712080340.49546.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071208014241.f4b138e0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071208194042.GO17037@thunk.org> <200712082330.54259.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071209021544.GY17037@thunk.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.5 (beta28) (fuki) (+CVS-20070806) (i386-suse-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1668 Lines: 44 At Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:49:51 +0100, I wrote: > > [Sorry for the late response as I've been on vacation] > > At Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:44 -0500, > Theodore Tso wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: > > > > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML > > > > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing > > > > the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in > > > > your regression list, > > > > > > Done, thanks. > > > > Great, thanks. I should add that technically this wasn't a regression > > since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23. Also, it isn't a > > big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to > > polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference > > (although I guess it's less efficient). > > > > Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the > > patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25! > > You mean 2.6.24 ? ;-) > > Yes, if it solves the problem, not only improves the latency, it's > definitely nice to have now. I was just too conservative to mark it > for 2.6.24 merge although it looks safe. > > Jaroslav, could you prepare this for the push? It corresponds to > alsa-kernel HG changeset 5557. Jaroslav, what about this now? Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/