Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-53965-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:17:17 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] workqueues and printk not playing nice since next-20240130
Message-ID: <08baa5cd-943b-47cc-832d-1cf6520bef1b@paulmck-laptop>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <c6ce8816-c4ff-4668-8cbb-88285330057d@huaweicloud.com>
 <25fd8537-5a27-4b62-9bf9-1ee7ca59b5b8@paulmck-laptop>
 <Zb0evDquygkDI_8P@slm.duckdns.org>
 <c5d5ad66-da86-447b-8014-820d2c67382d@paulmck-laptop>
 <ZcDdlRzpofn2cAuO@alley>
 <20240205132515.GF69174@google.com>
 <a6762ad5-62f2-41d4-bba7-c2d9dcb12498@paulmck-laptop>
 <ZcEfCM160K5cnzHx@slm.duckdns.org>
 <a8386e9d-39f6-4bd5-8329-30550fb2745a@paulmck-laptop>
 <ZcFFYR-JOrfp7kvn@slm.duckdns.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZcFFYR-JOrfp7kvn@slm.duckdns.org>

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:30:25AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 11:41:10AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > [    0.316453] ==================================================================
> > [    0.317646] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in wq_update_node_max_active+0x123/0x810
> > [    0.318851] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88802109d788 by task swapper/0/0
> 
> Ah, that one is fixed by 15930da42f89 ("workqueue: Don't call
> cpumask_test_cpu() with -1 CPU in wq_update_node_max_active()"). I have a
> hard time imagining that having anything to do with console being quiet tho.
> It's a cpumask bit test targeting cpu -1 and the result gets overwritten
> later during boot.

Thank you for confirming!

If the silent console comes up again, I will beat up on that more.

							Thanx, Paul