Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-54542-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 09:59:40 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>, Stefan Schmidt
 <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org,
 netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: ca8210: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from
 alloc_ordered_workqueue() call
Message-ID: <20240206095940.66e17802@xps-13>
In-Reply-To: <ZcF1El7fn5xkeoB1@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <ZcF1El7fn5xkeoB1@slm.duckdns.org>
Organization: Bootlin
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Tejun,

tj@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:53:54 -1000:

> Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound
> workqueues w/ @nr_active=3D=3D1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit WQ_UNBOU=
ND
> isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a warning in =
the
> future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional changes.
>=20

Looks okay to me.

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Thanks,
Miqu=C3=A8l