Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-55336-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240205191808.998754-1-frut3k7@gmail.com> <ZcH9u7Vo2sFERIHJ@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
 <CAKEyCaB2Cw0Ey73je96xDgofuXDnsC4DgeS9=HkOM6Kufrwbaw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZcIwGRU5NEZGpRy9@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> <CAKEyCaCQk+iL_zOr_0LFOA4Fw+SwyuzSWOvVgmO0Tn8Ygv-4hw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZcI9tWsthu8XMiZ1@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <ZcI9tWsthu8XMiZ1@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
From: frut3k7 <frut3k7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 17:48:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKEyCaC79kMoNSOOs1SREsvEGMGWPftqzDDMebvTVKDvTHeCMw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: spidev: Add Qualcomm spidev device compatible
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:10=E2=80=AFPM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrot=
e:
>
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 02:57:49PM +0100, frut3k7 wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 2:11=E2=80=AFPM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> =
wrote:
>
> > > This is out of tree, it's not exactly a good guide for mainline.  The=
 DT
> > > should describe the hardware, not how some particular software stack
> > > chooses to drive it.
>
> > Will changing from "spidev" to "qca4024" be enough?
>
> Should be I think.

Should both patches (spi and devicetree) be sent to two projects
(Linux SPI and Devicetree Bindings)?