Received: by 2002:a05:7412:2a8a:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id u10csp282539rdh; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 04:54:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG8oQnNSNn4YGz7uz06UwqKhtKI7Lb0wkSfEisGixuDItwzgMcsKq914zyqPbIhydwc9dWM X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1bcf:b0:68c:a58b:9f9d with SMTP id m15-20020a0562141bcf00b0068ca58b9f9dmr6378172qvc.61.1707310489690; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 04:54:49 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707310489; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VPLm8KXCO12R6LBjiEOuJqNmcWfDvlKTOD/7YsWUaGVq/DWgeBxzFEwTQQzSew+XfV 3qUhSi/2diAOE3N3/qVL6pKKVCZDe8+Bqsog5AAnmjlP+hYQOnoLeh3hBlrnjBaia/+p cM1Qgl9RP9lcprwRSdPbiWmR9HEbkB+4UA3if35IC0ZK95krkAWXJw9xirnDUpRE/Vrc 156H2CXF9S72YdgVoS+n+8vkFAWtk4jputfUcgJPWorGNC1hJWYdJxRR8NvwkzjdT8SA ocOSAg3BETVrdVzDlz2BNhKlNqkpd8qQTrF2NcRdLd/gWbvxqU2GDvNRyElMFBkYrTdF UL9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:date:from :dkim-signature; bh=rH3S7Gx6EkHv0n/mTPdhznhz84wicX9HQn91isn6v6M=; fh=nzBkPBpHhQuZK8ojNPa7iuDl96m/5Q1Jo3WVFX5gg6s=; b=XAWyBhxs1kfyIqYAa5yWi88a37FFNtmFBLsh5h3ofS3/DIWOP/heRK8+PCJFNoXDtN 9lJygDf7mxgXeZ6JVQXbH2z5eoSrJqbPirel9WRa2xqHlXWekiILU385kjGn5Gm8gNjP eydU1et9qaiNnZxlu6g1PdK9JXpIXf8GM5Z06ONzEeyUQwsrZ8o8qPEUFtGjocwcv/rc qI6ZSHPDv90Esyf44zKw17Hy/M2j9cFy4h/uQcOsZbfhd99q7t8uhB/K9gkkSQxQTgG3 IGDxuRztFwT67pIoH+4/fJJ3jk+wlhJKVFTgUWTx7NNoEcSPQY9wW/qMWPlRCDOK8H8R foKg==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=DsOUVtjB; arc=pass (i=1 dkim=pass dkdomain=intel.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.intel.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-56502-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-56502-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUT3IoX13rGo6ora6Y9WVwHYTCKqT2nP90nzfX5ciZhAVIW9lGwS0GE59xkGv86LlFcXj9mQjD1fiL1vDuOjNW6UfJ0qMBl/8ADlTIv2w== Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11-20020ad4418b000000b0068c968de041si1009835qvp.513.2024.02.07.04.54.49 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Feb 2024 04:54:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-56502-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=DsOUVtjB; arc=pass (i=1 dkim=pass dkdomain=intel.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.intel.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-56502-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-56502-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4271C25790 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38607605C; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="DsOUVtjB" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66FD76C63; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707310476; cv=none; b=OpD0ezMPYoigebkw0QH6Z6Yt0gVZKxtF9jNbEfR7/yQiDXR3jwdhBiOyJtxlpxWuODN1Scr4zfmwKwjTlpqqqSBUEgJyRzannGxG3F31kKFFwQ1ycuasGzUqHfhr+zSRl7Hy0dC02S6OYQwOB+FZKxS/9ZPFto+VVfzcZdhpy7M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707310476; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9Yl8cw6GMttrCBds2aQn0pjodVh3El22SlfJLyDMMzU=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pb7vMNHXOgHHNmBq8pXcJZHPJE+H8mQEWIt2qEPXBHsEGviYC/o7HvAktGL7NOjTcTNi9ODOwIwQtGGCQ51+0eSVKKjB+kd9VGUtD09/9eZqfiAfiMaC9Xhn+/NJhKjtMFQabS7k7YYPzBpDcWnNGhcaABkrNSEl1roYw19JCbI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=DsOUVtjB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707310474; x=1738846474; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=9Yl8cw6GMttrCBds2aQn0pjodVh3El22SlfJLyDMMzU=; b=DsOUVtjBvqB1iSKNXRlPh26M1vcRicXk7srlE5WYftap3xxp3M+dnpFv csN7LcUcRYUfsLiK+fYlRI34GDUwNT1cOU0gUX4AxjGaXXFz+crKZi8Sh yt+5d7dQvzr/HREwHTjjKpWOvz72o7Mpvpy7R7Pklsn1NhNSQwMbX5J15 JUi7NALaU8c+7ijjueaGEjrjwAZ/fLJ0idhGaq6eUlZpAq7vu2rnF9C5Q xYA2W02dM2ByxCEQXMjBpOLS9Qyeay/y4knFsFH5uqNvnFPoEVAkM0/qG uMSD1aXuKd+MSPMSIET+PJ8XeRqzdXkVGaSIDHpSx15KT1RKS5u9L5u80 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10976"; a="861631" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,251,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="861631" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Feb 2024 04:54:33 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,251,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="1356227" Received: from ijarvine-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.246.51.96]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Feb 2024 04:54:30 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 14:54:24 +0200 (EET) To: Jian-Hong Pan cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Johan Hovold , David Box , Mika Westerberg , Nirmal Patel , Jonathan Derrick , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux@endlessos.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI/ASPM: Fix L1SS parameters & only enable supported features when enable link state In-Reply-To: <20240207111854.576402-2-jhp@endlessos.org> Message-ID: References: <20240207111854.576402-2-jhp@endlessos.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 7 Feb 2024, Jian-Hong Pan wrote: > The original __pci_enable_link_state() configs the links directly without: > * Check the L1 substates features which are supported, or not > * Calculate & program related parameters for L1.2, such as T_POWER_ON, > Common_Mode_Restore_Time, and LTR_L1.2_THRESHOLD > > This leads some supported L1 PM substates of the link between VMD remapped > PCIe Root Port and NVMe get wrong configs when a caller tries to enabled > them. > > Here is a failed example on ASUS B1400CEAE with enabled VMD: > > Capabilities: [900 v1] L1 PM Substates > L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- L1_PM_Substates+ > PortCommonModeRestoreTime=32us PortTPowerOnTime=10us > L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- > T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns > L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us > > This patch initializes the link's L1 PM substates to get the supported > features and programs relating paramters, if some of them are going to be > enabled in __pci_enable_link_state(). Then, enables the L1 PM substates if > the caller intends to enable them and they are supported. > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218394 > Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan > --- > v2: > - Prepare the PCIe LTR parameters before enable L1 Substates > > v3: > - Only enable supported features for the L1 Substates part > > drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > index a39d2ee744cb..c866971cae70 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > @@ -1389,14 +1389,16 @@ static int __pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool locked) > link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L0S; > if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1) > link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1; > - /* L1 PM substates require L1 */ > - if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_1) > + if (state & ASPM_STATE_L1_2_MASK) > + aspm_l1ss_init(link); Your commit message didn't explain why you need to add this call here, why isn't the existing call to aspm_l1ss_init() enough to initialize what is needed? > + /* L1 PM substates require L1 and should be in supported list */ > + if (state & link->aspm_support & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_1) > link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1 | ASPM_STATE_L1; > - if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_2) > + if (state & link->aspm_support & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_2) > link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2 | ASPM_STATE_L1; > - if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_1_PCIPM) > + if (state & link->aspm_support & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_1_PCIPM) > link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1_PCIPM | ASPM_STATE_L1; > - if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM) > + if (state & link->aspm_support & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM) > link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM | ASPM_STATE_L1; It would be simpler and cleaner to just AND once with link->aspm_support to clear unsupported bits from state rather than doing it on every line like that. -- i.