From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sg_ring for scsi
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:26:47 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, dougg@torque.net
References: <200712201853.48643.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200712211013.38511.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20071221112834X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20071221112834X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200712211426.47896.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 736
Lines: 19

On Friday 21 December 2007 13:28:34 FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> I'm not sure about chaining the headers (as your sg_ring and
> scsi_sgtable do) would simplify LLDs. Have you looked at ips or
> qla1280?

Not yet, am working my way through the drivers, but I don't expect it will be 
a simplification to the normal SCSI LLDs.  Most of them are mere consumers of
sgs...

I'm not a SCSI person: I'm patching SCSI because I have to to get my own 
sg-using code clean :)

Hope that clarifies,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/