Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-56897-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8fafb8e1-b6be-4d08-945f-b464e3a396c8@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <999a4733-c554-43ca-a6e9-998c939fbeb8@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <202402070622.D2DCD9C4@keescook> <CAHC9VhTJ85d6jBFBMYUoA4CrYgb6i9yHDC_tFce9ACKi7UTa6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <202402070740.CFE981A4@keescook> <CAHC9VhT+eORkacqafT_5KWSgkRS-QLz89a2LEVJHvi7z7ts0MQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=whSMoFWCw=p1Nyu5DJ2hP2k=dYmPp-WjeY8xuc7O=ts7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whSMoFWCw=p1Nyu5DJ2hP2k=dYmPp-WjeY8xuc7O=ts7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:12:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQ4UZGOJg=DCEokKEP7e5S62pSax+XOgiBB-qQ=WGCbOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] LSM: add security_execve_abort() hook
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, 
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>, 
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, 
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>, 
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, 
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 12:57=E2=80=AFPM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 16:45, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, let's get confirmation from Tetsuo on the current state of
> > TOMOYO in Linus' tree.  If it is currently broken [..]
>
> As far as I understand, the current state is working, just the horrid
> random flag.
>
> So I think the series is a cleanup and worth doing, but also not
> hugely urgent. But it would probably be good to just get this whole
> thing over and done with, rather than leave it lingering for another
> release for no reason.

I've always operated under a policy of "just fixes" during the -rcX
period of development, but you're the boss.  Once we get something
suitable for merging I'll send it up to you after it has soaked in
linux-next for a bit.

--=20
paul-moore.com