Message-ID: <476B6448.7090805@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:59:20 -0800
From: Srinivas Kommu <kommu@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: Srinivas Kommu <kommu@hotmail.com>
Subject: driver spin lock and files_lock deadlock question
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1068
Lines: 27

I have a driver that needs to be SMP-safe. It also has some code hooking 
into the net_rx_action softirq. So it takes a spinlock and disables the 
local bottom-half around its critical sections: 
spin_lock_bh(&driver_lock). Now, I'm facing a deadlock under a 
particular sequence involving the files_lock:

1. CPU 0 takes driver_lock and then calls remove_proc_entry() which is 
hanging at spin_lock(&files_lock).

2. CPU 1 was in fput() which took files_lock; the softirq comes in at 
this point and attempts to take driver_lock and hangs forever.

It seems this kind of a deadlock can happen with any kernel lock, not 
just files_lock. What's the driver's mistake here? Is it wrong to call 
remove_proc_entry() while holding another lock? What is the right thing 
to do?

This is with the 2.4 kernel, BTW.


thanks
srini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/