Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:23:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:22:56 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:35854 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:22:42 -0500 Message-Id: <200112302316.AAA10906@webserver.ithnet.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi , Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= , Robert Love , Linux Kernel List Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:16:57 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler ... To: timothy.covell@ashavan.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: IMHO/0.97.1 (Webmail for Roxen) In-Reply-To: <200112301951.fBUJoxSr011753@svr3.applink.net> From: Stephan von Krawczynski Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Saturday 29 December 2001 17:38, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > [Offtopic seti hints :-) ] > Ummm, on my Dual P-III (650MHz with 524988416 Bytes), my current Seti > efficiency is 5.35 CpF. That's a tad high/slower than an Ultra Sparc IIi > according to their stats. So, it would appear that being SMP is hurting my > performance a bit. Unless that is that you meant to run a seti instance for > each CPU? Yes, exactly, use one seti per cpu and you will be happy :-) As far as I know they intended it this way. Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/