Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:44:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:44:07 -0500 Received: from mail.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.52]:17678 "EHLO mail.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:43:56 -0500 Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:46:13 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Stephan von Krawczynski cc: Timothy Covell , Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= , Robert Love , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler ... In-Reply-To: <200112302320.AAA10992@webserver.ithnet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Timothy Covell wrote: > > > > > each CPU? And this reminds me of how "make -j3 bzlilo" is slower > than > > > "make -j2 bzlilo". > > > > Running N CPU bound tasks on an M way SMP machine with N > M is > never > > going to improve your performace. On the contrary, expecially with > the > > current scheduler that keeps rotating the three tasks between the > two > > CPUs, you're going to suffer a slight performance degradation. > > And can you please post a patch for this? http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/mss-2.html#patches - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/