Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3b8b:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id nd11csp287109rdb; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 06:08:44 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCXTKemsBl5rn5C8/ut9kFK1Uo/ciYYg47qbQ8DZeNiVE0hppBlWEgGqKBTVvTtiA6dHogmEYd0G9KvshlpLUpp7erHhsBrhhbcJVBFjew== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH7FBTkR+hdUGJuTxG652Tl0HXk6lT1PPLECnJaKVSO4dJjlyLcr1kFDHOE/lr5fQF97dJJ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:300b:b0:6dd:db87:6356 with SMTP id ay11-20020a056a00300b00b006dddb876356mr7653085pfb.7.1707401323990; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 06:08:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707401323; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=F1UkCIU7UREIIfp6rCaizafw+5n5YuRd8GpmGPg7glxmv/vm2HKNYap22RF9h1qHdR IsGRxRjYZIvFRhzgxV/xE7Arap2rQkWHtAahGWE9X3+egTU/w9Webu68EHa+qv0qu8rC zbDlrXUg5UJbu5fyK6F+N6K6KzGgk8pFwcZjWh0NPgBCYysSohhwiEboAS5mLO8trwm/ /1KADK61NNGPwLDKx2x9hPdF8jFIe5WRE9/ThIz3R/zg14/FL2FdSFkrrd+2e5hDmCZF QQlOBNfFx+5C9s4MmmQ+UlDlIl+/dEdHHJuFiRk4lEtH9ZgyhDL4TBIPtJV14aYVK9eq eyRA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature :dkim-signature:from; bh=JHDIQzkGG+MPwKNeQEZx8vGwHDj28JgeiF1oIt02Zz8=; fh=97EnryFI0nrhUxydmZj++l+aD6cCulwZfhukf+Zs0yk=; b=0InDwAbutYueFuN2nmRcXCdQmOQjBKJZjmwMIXQrV/CUxFnydxwBGnN1wbwg9a9lYo jjN8w0p3sL7UmHXh3oKKe15r2q+aqCwKfImjY022DGaPHV0td1bnBcjw8rNSio2Pp0EG ibRdxksWIJRiX7GOUUdyzhTxbHrA6GV+s1sFDtpkXXjbNcahIkc68Pxnynd125weScF3 PqMCZXTfmOczL33VltARHqppx0oQ+AreOcrmXo1JJ5Vdf/JYAygUTC2YXJ02NDu0CrrM l/evX4p7frgttT/DcHkMNx0W8Kd1U6ah0+766jOZXd0KW9/cX7b+LLWutoq4DJ6j7TTi 2q4w==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=iJke3Ccm; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linutronix.de dkim=pass dkdomain=linutronix.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=linutronix.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-58164-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-58164-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUsWk7NKZUimwHrPywWVkJ+nS1ND5q0Wga8ZTIpv6vML7hFbGodEwOvXpElJEZJNu51mqlDNBxoz56ESa8W8uWCD7AJ84pIYRtVn9swTQ== Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.48.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b15-20020a6567cf000000b005ced6c45233si3798330pgs.712.2024.02.08.06.08.43 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Feb 2024 06:08:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-58164-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=iJke3Ccm; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linutronix.de dkim=pass dkdomain=linutronix.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=linutronix.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-58164-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-58164-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B13ABB28D6D for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D6776418; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="iJke3Ccm"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Y2wIRbRb" Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE77969300; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707399598; cv=none; b=EUeFYaJmWyvarFqWHbfBqxxsZ274qHdpiURAsGq9iHDHhnhg6e7SNs9nJgPcc5TqL4mAd78rNAn7rNefEsAz/CGuyUDbaJHAxzASpQbivl/VXd1w1xzXo7iuoV6WEcTjhOG1ZvcNrvI1z2vlAWMdILl6BpcNr0hF3Y49UrmxjuQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707399598; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GAQvZFPGVkGIRHn+TfnYrCD/18BFSOgL0xVQMh03f7Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=F/vCsIPUHS/j5Bctc/V/xavVIjlOXg3Tt37h4mTgzC4TUVkgMqGfxDakA+eZH5GkDXcs08TpojCm+LJknxQ3ry7dXXOKrUnOHtIyzltUZ1Dtq84FfqFQfy2ISDbfY7W/63vVOd5BC74pJcUQb2tGUm1QAhfiV/ppoKl060N0BWE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=iJke3Ccm; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Y2wIRbRb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1707399594; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JHDIQzkGG+MPwKNeQEZx8vGwHDj28JgeiF1oIt02Zz8=; b=iJke3CcmBJMtWum8U7gZsj4lHvZ7Z1HEwpCpjS5J6VZV/416zRHLSESuKSLlVApH9xlhXh w0Ak3425v8+HR6ct9inEZeoa9HRszriudVsxIbNId8Jo1N+rwNXidLQADuIVgvzCdPlNts bJqc+71IT7NGwdGDuaN5N6cDDzgLwAgDpjNC6S4orLxCQRQ3dLDQGyhfmls6bDSDITHz/V 1Awd/WgChIrUxjjQAe7tnOnTBuKXuf3EuFrK74GzPTEWqo7zgeI1Z6imUuHCcWUry/YEig HY/iS6bzhyp09nsQGFL8lqm98jQW444z/4rncqLfVDBPxh7tc0p83Ig3AyV8TQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1707399594; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JHDIQzkGG+MPwKNeQEZx8vGwHDj28JgeiF1oIt02Zz8=; b=Y2wIRbRbEDvbBO2IyXfdji8e+QXRZPCsQg1+nF7w/n2BZeNn3qvKdVdXSv9kiDq+XqMcZb NY7+ruHKvCgQJhBA== To: Greg KH , Petr Mladek Cc: Sreenath Vijayan , corbet@lwn.net, jirislaby@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, taichi.shimoyashiki@sony.com, daniel.palmer@sony.com, anandakumar.balasubramaniam@sony.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tty/sysrq: Dump printk ring buffer messages via sysrq In-Reply-To: <2024020845-antiquely-faculty-407d@gregkh> References: <2024020845-antiquely-faculty-407d@gregkh> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 14:45:43 +0106 Message-ID: <87v86zt6qo.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On 2024-02-08, Greg KH wrote: > I just remembered all the rt-changes coming down the pipe for > consoles/printk, is this going to mess with that? It will not mess with the changes because we will continue to support the legacy consoles anyway. > So when this option fails when people need it the most, perhaps it's not > worth adding? When else would people want to use it? The feature could be massively improved once the rt-changes (atomic consoles) become available. Petr also brought up valid points about this feature (such as the loglevel) that should be considered. We should clarify what exactly we want this feature to do. The actual implementation is the easy part. John