Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3b8b:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id nd11csp412844rdb; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:18:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IExjBSbf/e4p5Vj/sKrOuuRP8dUMqaCrsmtQJhm+xRW3UnRIBMftFYbF//S/sQX1ONKvSZx X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:f14f:b0:206:a3d2:8325 with SMTP id l15-20020a056870f14f00b00206a3d28325mr88319oac.54.1707412714393; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:18:34 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXXsIuGc0lTUZ7mBjRu/j0U8RtSsHt9CTmJKrKiIZJlZHMf0Yoe9qWxy0Xc/l+X3djRo1B0m0vAGVIRYOfDyjQdK6hgZY94AH6ovW1m1w== Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s20-20020a656914000000b005d8bce9b04dsi57699pgq.681.2024.02.08.09.18.34 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:18:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-58431-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=jz2kKRJp; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-58431-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-58431-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911C1288121 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797AA81204; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jz2kKRJp" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CFA17B3C2; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707412540; cv=none; b=WssO38IZlcoLhmN8UGWEXYM/plDFJusCzGFhQZuopDl251ctdDZH1R6qeNamTUwuWS1MS5mW/uqtBIrDT3KtMsf1DGryuV6/OCNqRtnHm7VElIWxS0+gzHDSIWmdRdzSqZWEl3sCH+ofDaXgRaat4GLZjvpsr2YACkccqiAE4J8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707412540; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p76xqtocPXxIASp/RvwQN97YAIQh0QlwZC10TmxGnq0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=H7E4fT68Ay9gcHD4F4tm9o16fdPG5xcNwKapfrQZJnFN2L9mSiOjElSJekdXX7Io9xDsR+fhrDT1xtHYlPE2uZXENADmtFHNUpTwWqvruFn5xR/z1MBR7ofwJofBnw+5EAq9laxc7GW9aFnKo4+kOkQ9L/4ql6IPRO+HUCsxVM4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jz2kKRJp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707412540; x=1738948540; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=p76xqtocPXxIASp/RvwQN97YAIQh0QlwZC10TmxGnq0=; b=jz2kKRJpJZRqmgKHolbk+geF9tcOM5CkaAyv1Is2zCoeOKzu3X/6JX2f dB7+I/zHv/4fC74iGlbGY+GyQXa7yEPCVsCdoEQY+/DeH6qb49na2oJ4F hTzGd4LDZogVBWiVMzyXhX8cWOdStJVl2ZdtFvvEAM+3y+j9usu41f3Q/ MYy9sTo5aEG9CFV9WV1B30ON+424STbuixiLraMCfnGnRHUwcXELQXyU8 aZpkkaNBisOt7SjZAdfmSzlHTnILm0Pbr4eAUikeR0Oz4jTsLWle7Z5e5 BU6xUMC3bOHJSHS0mIU50CyjxrOiCmFhysvgA0Zkji/B/Ts35BI0wo0TX w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10978"; a="11841737" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,254,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="11841737" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Feb 2024 09:15:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10978"; a="910429976" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,254,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="910429976" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Feb 2024 09:15:34 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rY7zn-00000002vyu-3v1g; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 19:15:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 19:15:31 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Lee Jones Cc: Flavio Suligoi , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Thompson , Jingoo Han , Helge Deller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] backlight: mp3309c: Allow to use on non-OF platforms Message-ID: References: <20240201151537.367218-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240208113425.GK689448@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240208113425.GK689448@google.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:34:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 01 Feb 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: .. > > backlight: mp3309c: Utilise temporary variable for struct device (1) > Set no longer applies. Please rebase, thanks. I got a contradictory messages: 1) email that says that all had been applied; 2) this email (that tells the complete opposite); 3) the repository where the first two were applied. While you can amend your scripts, I think I need to rebase only the last patch (1) that may not be found in your tree currently. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko