Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-58446-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 19:22:52 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, lakshmi.sowjanya.d@intel.com,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] pwm: dwc: use pm_sleep_ptr() macro
Message-ID: <ZcUN7NHCSEXnezV5@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240208070529.28562-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
 <20240208070529.28562-6-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240208070529.28562-6-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 12:35:29PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using
> pm_sleep_ptr() macro, so that the compiler can discard it in case
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n.

> Fixes: 30b5b066fa83 ("pwm: dwc: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for PM functions")

Fixes always should go first in the series.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko