Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-58942-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 20:41:28 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, quic_ppratap@quicinc.com, 
	quic_jackp@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8295p: Enable tertiary
 controller and its 4 USB ports
Message-ID: <ofunpypiiyyhbn5dtrotaluyf3bq7rfj5gwbrku4ibw2dqh4dt@6sxsks33yw5b>
References: <20240206114745.1388491-1-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
 <20240206114745.1388491-3-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
 <CAA8EJpoed-hu4hPXAcwQxmJAaNRwJ2y5q9qybWaPP8bdMnz_oA@mail.gmail.com>
 <0470a930-d629-4467-b619-58d3e76f59a7@quicinc.com>
 <CAA8EJppJAdHXoVs_2VqQf=_Wk_LoEcNMY2H-Xzqu8KzeaN8i0g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA8EJppJAdHXoVs_2VqQf=_Wk_LoEcNMY2H-Xzqu8KzeaN8i0g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 03:24:45PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 14:28, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
> <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/6/2024 5:43 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 14:03, Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Enable tertiary controller for SA8295P (based on SC8280XP).
> > >> Add pinctrl support for usb ports to provide VBUS to connected peripherals.
> > >
> > > These are not just pinctrl entries. They hide VBUS regulators. Please
> > > implement them properly as corresponding vbus regulators.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Dmitry. Apologies, can you elaborate on your comment. I thought this
> > implementation was fine as Konrad reviewed it in v13 [1]. I removed his
> > RB tag as I made one change of dropping "_state" in labels.
> 
> My comment is pretty simple: if I'm not mistaken, your DT doesn't
> reflect your hardware design.
> You have actual VBUS regulators driven by these GPIO pins. Is this correct?
> If so, you should describe them properly in the device tree rather
> than describing them just as USB host's pinctrl state.
> 

This is correct, these gpios are wired to the enable-pin of a set of
regulators providing the VBUS voltage. Please, Krishna, represent them
as always-on fixed-regulators instead.

Regards,
Bjorn