Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756392AbXLUTud (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:50:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753758AbXLUTuZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:50:25 -0500 Received: from tomts52-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.177]:55699 "EHLO tomts52-srv.bellnexxia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753497AbXLUTuY (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:50:24 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAC+oa0dFn+Sr/2dsb2JhbACRVZg6Aw Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:50:19 -0500 From: Mike Houston To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Jean Delvare , Shaohua Li , Mike Houston , Adrian Bunk , Elvis Pranskevichus , mhoffman@lightlink.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Adam Belay , Zhao Yakui , Thomas Renninger , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.24-rc4 hwmon it87 probe fails Message-Id: <20071221145019.b853c67e.mikeserv@bmts.com> In-Reply-To: <200712211200.30947.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> References: <20071204215154.7f26285e.mikeserv@bmts.com> <200712171014.44360.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <20071218185918.5d2d4c7d@hyperion.delvare> <200712211200.30947.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.6 (GTK+ 2.10.14; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1159 Lines: 41 On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:00:30 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > What do you think of something like the following patch? If we do > this, I don't think we'd need to force pnpacpi=off or change the > way PNP reserves resources. > > I'll be on vacation until about January 2, so I won't be able to > do much with this until then. > > > > [patch] it87: request only Environment Controller ports I'm not qualified to give an opinion on what's proper for the kernel, so all I can say is that I've applied it (to fresh 2.6.24-rc6 source without Shaohua's pnpacpi patch) and it works nicely for me. >From /proc/ioports: 0290-029f : pnp 00:01 0290-0294 : pnp 00:01 0295-0296 : it87 0295-0296 : it87 >From dmesg: system 00:01: ioport range 0x290-0x29f has been reserved ... system 00:01: ioport range 0x290-0x294 has been reserved My sensors work. Thanks for this patch, Mike Houston -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/