Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760456AbXLUWwz (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:52:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754358AbXLUWwr (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:52:47 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:53478 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753768AbXLUWwr (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:52:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:51:32 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Christoph Lameter cc: Pekka Enberg , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , LKML , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Christoph Hellwig , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1197049846.1645.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071211143336.GA17866@elte.hu> <20071221120908.GA15926@elte.hu> <84144f020712210944q3e0539f8vd8a249f69d456dc7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 726 Lines: 22 On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Actually thanks for pointing that out Pekka.... Here is a patch that takes > the regression almost completely away Now *this* is what I wanted to see - rather than argue against other peoples performance regression reports, an actual patch that acknowledges the problem. Thanks. And now, can the people who made the problem reports and complained about SLUB please test the patch - the ball is now in your court! Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/