Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-59940-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 22:33:01 +0200
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, lakshmi.sowjanya.d@intel.com,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] pwm: dwc: simplify error handling
Message-ID: <ZcaL_VH2l5t9cx6m@black.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240208070529.28562-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
 <20240208070529.28562-4-raag.jadav@intel.com>
 <ZcUNxT4lxFYhZNBB@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZcUNxT4lxFYhZNBB@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 07:22:13PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 12:35:27PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > Simplify error handling in ->probe() function using dev_err_probe() helper.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to enable device (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> 
> Have you checked the output?
> Note, it will duplicate error codes which we don't want.

True. Does it make sense to remove it?

Raag