Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 20:53:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 20:53:18 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:38923 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 20:53:05 -0500 Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 20:52:57 -0500 From: Lennert Buytenhek To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Jeff Dike , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] global errno considered harmful Message-ID: <20011230205257.A19891@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <20011230110623.A17083@gnu.org> <200112301956.OAA02630@ccure.karaya.com> <20011230190020.A14157@dea.linux-mips.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011230190020.A14157@dea.linux-mips.net>; from ralf@uni-koblenz.de on Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 07:00:20PM -0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 07:00:20PM -0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > As user application are trying to use unistd.h and expect errno to get > set properly unistd.h or at least it's syscallX macros will have to be > made unusable from userspace or silent breakage of such apps rebuild > against new headers will occur. How about conditionalising definition of_syscallX on __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__? (http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/errno_ectomy-1-to-2.diff) I guess I'll go ask all arch maintainers' permission now.. cheers, Lennert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/