Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-60082-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] perf symbols: Slightly improve module file executable section mappings
Date: Fri,  9 Feb 2024 14:16:10 -0800
Message-ID: <170751693770.1169242.13110612989281667030.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240208085326.13432-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
References: <20240208085326.13432-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:53:24 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Currently perf does not record module section addresses except for
> the .text section. In general that means perf cannot get module section
> mappings correct (except for .text) when loading symbols from a kernel
> module file. (Note using --kcore does not have this issue)
> 
> Here are a couple of patches to help shed light upon and slightly improve
> the situation.
> 
> [...]

Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>