Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3b8b:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id nd11csp1246210rdb; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:28:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHJmmxHJMRPU/5JFw8caY4FEWYp6E0WjXaHzntzZv2SjoMwtLYWIBiqYwr3+P/SPlo2QPs+ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:9e48:b0:19a:7e25:d7d3 with SMTP id mt8-20020a056a209e4800b0019a7e25d7d3mr808256pzb.18.1707521333666; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:28:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707521333; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oyLsZR9FA7I6UubKmekUfzEvTnvKENuR8oybJ7yPBlvrvlQc7RIxvc+UaNnq2uBYb3 0+kiluWARoGLH3XH7qn334RhzHICqQ7oRGkeyeH+t5CCIFgFv8JNxnBgKIGjYuhPoNLP pbmKDmVCmFdPCkWaZblBjb/6HBdVo0lBFnZbuRU3pGfz2/PRZRQwSTFcVDISmV5cAM4J j2HWpSk7yZEKaqPc+9z/3m8oNUy4Ho44aZVEZbxuK4iyz4t/9Vzlu7HI2R44LF63Eqwo JKR7ALwCIk1jl34gRpC9J8IJTWGF2rzOBTJNV7y4oeWDjyrAoihTAMFHJv5ZwjXdtey5 qcJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=K106Bzh0n5UInBR/L7wofyYTuf2g110PR+AywkGDKOo=; fh=cop7H5TIW0uOuEeqHnEzoi0kTSL+0qOw/EPtLhJt0dg=; b=eiTi93b/6bB4IdaJPzGxmobqk/b8gDq8VYMucyQjB3lMQdmHfdhUi6IMh1inCmTFDr +gdH/8KfO6K57Z8pxovkoCjLT6ptbJTZFHKWyuyEIFEg02FyzbjTJx1BnePk5z9PIKqR udS+iJvmYWq9Tljz2x4YLKMUDfRT7vcc2f/RTl+B3qoVeg8J0g6JyhTkTvjF2q2w5aKS 6VJQF+N8EGg28MDt+u8LE7QbhJ2jgZohIv+oR22uhmOgbh/AcbOHaN4pgASbN2ApmZuj ots478v4Ffqr8l6xSF2ydakdz52LHRY5epXMTlFQZ+uVdPkWCWsIYXWczr8bPcvfg3QN iL9w==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=TSygHfx+; arc=pass (i=1 dkim=pass dkdomain=kernel.org); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-60134-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-60134-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXkgVaLZNcGhkjY6xj3drYT5Vn2JW5Bowmbm82qTYQcWE8yN1/Hnyn/pcRAM+gjlUB0er7Lw/Nq9KhgLGaEIEyqLE1LwaXLOZtBCCHPug== Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.48.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x32-20020a056a0018a000b006dbe30aeb1dsi1104765pfh.112.2024.02.09.15.28.53 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:28:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-60134-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=TSygHfx+; arc=pass (i=1 dkim=pass dkdomain=kernel.org); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-60134-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-60134-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C3B2B22B8C for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 23:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65339374F7; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TSygHfx+" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6601C16439; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 23:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707520019; cv=none; b=uNr4ABnkE9qE0KmUkDuJ5ARMwP4TeiYEJnK6rH530ZBLpuk5UUiLGTM3LYbf/hOEXpG1k9i02NDb4/yTftzZbwMLddURwb55O0Vg0fcF7UBGMb6EhM0HhtOOQzFHVvZUW5XfFjYMm+r/S8iga8xTkdJX2Er4oN9oQ8+qOosdBrk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707520019; c=relaxed/simple; bh=70eC7jYE9SWe8H3WYp8GdKqMGczdzmfsoBZBFQZ8HaE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=iJ2XJTvgtqdlK99+TsU4/sK8xPNBY5SZZY82hS/A7q/YJzYEKqNg5N4B1Od9eP9COYNqBxq0UIZHFKhdFAYJWSZNzK0Ah34zCCP5PrEuUkJZ7Mnuy1aZ6BzfhHwVhJwOVDzKMv57kf+S9g4Y9w+8QBe9dwHN+LJxFQ4D18F7UM0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TSygHfx+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85B9DC433F1; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 23:06:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707520018; bh=70eC7jYE9SWe8H3WYp8GdKqMGczdzmfsoBZBFQZ8HaE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=TSygHfx+JieKNZKGAi14qEj+XeToKq6W3RQaPE5iquU/frzAOrB+3bqwoHIW0TjvH d+tTUimGEb47Ux0r80p4o0XOzMn7VtjswCa3mqTby8AgLVp9fiL4H0Iy+MUI3ZS0JF TNU9RtbWkPafGzorhrdKg/S0wwIbOFOoPXGMc8mwPl8oApcJ0YVOlv7DY/E1uCtGXU sYKLEOT93UG5JRuCriwmxu980gvIIs8Vpw8/yafjsKofotAs9TLUQqZuH3y/TStc0s PJZppvyMZDJzckfp8lcqoQZswT63UA2yF0NZb8nyi+WMiweDE6X2aLtI1LdQC3F5Kv 4dgN/deTVH5IQ== From: Namhyung Kim To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ian Rogers Cc: Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RESEND] perf lock contention: Account contending locks too Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:06:57 -0800 Message-ID: <20240209230657.1546739-1-namhyung@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.687.g38aa6559b0-goog Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Currently it accounts the contention using delta between timestamps in lock:contention_begin and lock:contention_end tracepoints. But it means the lock should see the both events during the monitoring period. Actually there are 4 cases that happen with the monitoring: monitoring period / \ | | 1: B------+-----------------------+--------E 2: B----+-------------E | 3: | B-----------+----E 4: | B-------------E | | | t0 t1 where B and E mean contention BEGIN and END, respectively. So it only accounts the case 4 for now. It seems there's no way to handle the case 1. The case 2 might be handled if it saved the timestamp (t0), but it lacks the information from the B notably the flags which shows the lock types. Also it could be a nested lock which it currently ignores. So I think we should ignore the case 2. However we can handle the case 3 if we save the timestamp (t1) at the end of the period. And then it can iterate the map entries in the userspace and update the lock stat accordinly. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++ .../perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 16 +-- tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c index 31ff19afc20c..d6bafd9a3955 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c @@ -179,6 +179,119 @@ int lock_contention_prepare(struct lock_contention *con) return 0; } +static void mark_end_timestamp(void) +{ + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts, + .flags = BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU, + ); + int prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.end_timestamp); + + bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &opts); +} + +static void update_lock_stat(int map_fd, int pid, u64 end_ts, + enum lock_aggr_mode aggr_mode, + struct tstamp_data *ts_data) +{ + u64 delta; + struct contention_key stat_key = {}; + struct contention_data stat_data; + + if (ts_data->timestamp >= end_ts) + return; + + delta = end_ts - ts_data->timestamp; + + switch (aggr_mode) { + case LOCK_AGGR_CALLER: + stat_key.stack_id = ts_data->stack_id; + break; + case LOCK_AGGR_TASK: + stat_key.pid = pid; + break; + case LOCK_AGGR_ADDR: + stat_key.lock_addr_or_cgroup = ts_data->lock; + break; + case LOCK_AGGR_CGROUP: + /* TODO */ + return; + default: + return; + } + + if (bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &stat_key, &stat_data) < 0) + return; + + stat_data.total_time += delta; + stat_data.count++; + + if (delta > stat_data.max_time) + stat_data.max_time = delta; + if (delta < stat_data.min_time) + stat_data.min_time = delta; + + bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &stat_key, &stat_data, BPF_EXIST); +} + +/* + * Account entries in the tstamp map (which didn't see the corresponding + * lock:contention_end tracepoint) using end_ts. + */ +static void account_end_timestamp(struct lock_contention *con) +{ + int ts_fd, stat_fd; + int *prev_key, key; + u64 end_ts = skel->bss->end_ts; + int total_cpus; + enum lock_aggr_mode aggr_mode = con->aggr_mode; + struct tstamp_data ts_data, *cpu_data; + + /* Iterate per-task tstamp map (key = TID) */ + ts_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.tstamp); + stat_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.lock_stat); + + prev_key = NULL; + while (!bpf_map_get_next_key(ts_fd, prev_key, &key)) { + if (bpf_map_lookup_elem(ts_fd, &key, &ts_data) == 0) { + int pid = key; + + if (aggr_mode == LOCK_AGGR_TASK && con->owner) + pid = ts_data.flags; + + update_lock_stat(stat_fd, pid, end_ts, aggr_mode, + &ts_data); + } + + prev_key = &key; + } + + /* Now it'll check per-cpu tstamp map which doesn't have TID. */ + if (aggr_mode == LOCK_AGGR_TASK || aggr_mode == LOCK_AGGR_CGROUP) + return; + + total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu; + ts_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.tstamp_cpu); + + cpu_data = calloc(total_cpus, sizeof(*cpu_data)); + if (cpu_data == NULL) + return; + + prev_key = NULL; + while (!bpf_map_get_next_key(ts_fd, prev_key, &key)) { + if (bpf_map_lookup_elem(ts_fd, &key, cpu_data) < 0) + goto next; + + for (int i = 0; i < total_cpus; i++) { + update_lock_stat(stat_fd, -1, end_ts, aggr_mode, + &cpu_data[i]); + } + +next: + prev_key = &key; + } + free(cpu_data); +} + int lock_contention_start(void) { skel->bss->enabled = 1; @@ -188,6 +301,7 @@ int lock_contention_start(void) int lock_contention_stop(void) { skel->bss->enabled = 0; + mark_end_timestamp(); return 0; } @@ -301,6 +415,8 @@ int lock_contention_read(struct lock_contention *con) if (stack_trace == NULL) return -1; + account_end_timestamp(con); + if (con->aggr_mode == LOCK_AGGR_TASK) { struct thread *idle = __machine__findnew_thread(machine, /*pid=*/0, diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c index 95cd8414f6ef..fb54bd38e7d0 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c @@ -19,13 +19,6 @@ #define LCB_F_PERCPU (1U << 4) #define LCB_F_MUTEX (1U << 5) -struct tstamp_data { - __u64 timestamp; - __u64 lock; - __u32 flags; - __s32 stack_id; -}; - /* callstack storage */ struct { __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE); @@ -140,6 +133,8 @@ int perf_subsys_id = -1; /* determine the key of lock stat */ int aggr_mode; +__u64 end_ts; + /* error stat */ int task_fail; int stack_fail; @@ -559,4 +554,11 @@ int BPF_PROG(collect_lock_syms) return 0; } +SEC("raw_tp/bpf_test_finish") +int BPF_PROG(end_timestamp) +{ + end_ts = bpf_ktime_get_ns(); + return 0; +} + char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "Dual BSD/GPL"; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h index 08482daf61be..36af11faad03 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h @@ -3,6 +3,13 @@ #ifndef UTIL_BPF_SKEL_LOCK_DATA_H #define UTIL_BPF_SKEL_LOCK_DATA_H +struct tstamp_data { + u64 timestamp; + u64 lock; + u32 flags; + u32 stack_id; +}; + struct contention_key { u32 stack_id; u32 pid; -- 2.43.0.687.g38aa6559b0-goog