Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3b8b:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id nd11csp1881043rdb; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 01:18:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF1EZG87eIaTs2/Q53IS05ZijI16svR0B5mzBMaYkXrx9VCEn93QyfJnzmPCLvZrnYqu/WC X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:16d0:b0:785:af71:be3f with SMTP id a16-20020a05620a16d000b00785af71be3fmr3851483qkn.16.1707643095795; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 01:18:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707643095; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=P2boDJXq9iWk9ZIJnM6GfQBagl+ECCTWn0+GpgfuP7HdLIe0sd9J64dJu5WENJkf7a yf8sfeoZRrRW3a74GIGPm/5DNblb+CFbaiukTpkM9NsIU38vxh0Pr9BfDlhiXYvW/rxw YTGAmKWqxh3PuyYcUcRElSLxpd15TF1KEY6HJEYMtwVPgPUi4BUikRbtuODKAq3ov6az 2LfTlE4zf9Z7XCbAfk2K9riGXr2e2VgxHG30wJ7+jDIPl+hloAKbeQYfsOIPvTdwpj67 GyWWOQ+9XKApTucEw1G5L/y2mb9L/unGyhaiHolcG3T0KzwR3UR7UB28MrwVA5/whzbX Q3tQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=nyUqcldidtnXWwbTceXwthhkZZm9TNzWOm9++Z2b+gM=; fh=Ly0ACoZRIZozrkO0ChA4ZUOI4y8YIHjF+VMbkA4uBDc=; b=uhXg/AsN6pMFz+pGYt0Af7Sywpsx5oT+CCNpYtNoDk2/6oGgVIT/Z6JPRwFNZz2eFT ObGUMBTnVfMOzkpood4ens4Bf59kgvgTMDjdTKekSkSV/ZDMaN+oWn7vXI2donQrMxem Q46eajzEfZYf5yw89kCdFVBezU6WcPY51BTsoHZW2hQ7hhE94s1VcLUQGpoH62V9ELx5 aptpZqSX3ojIHFgI1A85wjj9aut5D9zF1Xuu4Gr4e4uTDmvaCEb+TJiJO/MSfqUtHYT8 y6zy2m8nciCYMrEjjNP/bvZcGZzl+jMSS4EDZ3DkJqVDAX4ZmMINVBGhtBdb45AWqGhv KucQ==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tum.de header.s=tu-postout21 header.b=fXFBmetf; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=tum.de dkim=pass dkdomain=tum.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=tum.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-60676-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-60676-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=tum.de X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCV1Cag/ND0Zywcxllawwj18+99HIIkM2y915j+2Si2zZSi0qh5QHelvCdABoxdiKpGoj+CKhw9AWPFxwIGXOGn0tSfP/FgA8EeQsLG6dw== Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pj3-20020a05620a1d8300b00783fbb2113esi3353317qkn.452.2024.02.11.01.18.15 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 01:18:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-60676-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tum.de header.s=tu-postout21 header.b=fXFBmetf; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=tum.de dkim=pass dkdomain=tum.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=tum.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-60676-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-60676-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=tum.de Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805831C2118F for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2571F59160; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tum.de header.i=@tum.de header.b="fXFBmetf" Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de (postout1.mail.lrz.de [129.187.255.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464E359162 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=129.187.255.137 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707643085; cv=none; b=o/xzVltZEliyRoZ7tYW27m0ZRJyeHikVrn6qVpKjwa9IPDKWzER93dkuPOWHwlQ9GTSaqzW2gxdLuYBXivGDmaDa0GFqeWCcJZraf/ZUGlpOOIAdxrGlsZLgjt0kwXvAs/vyfSI5BkE3TcRq1CmBKp6ncgANFuANPBxo644GCRI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707643085; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aEaq/TzcHg4rMQdODyuar0MImODB9bbF3bqWLrgPZ6Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gLw1z4SrlMknkLdYYxcyFKu6eGhrb1/2KkPJMboVis/DOMWE3l2HYcae0NQ+psWMZOedZF4NeNMxdRgTQhmnCKP5tQ2MSP5vQl6zb4ucdonwBswu3cRw9NWeqYTLgKnljbK0i0H3bdWp7UvqsIuUK3n+XjwyaRYyBVNM2pDdPLY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=tum.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tum.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tum.de header.i=@tum.de header.b=fXFBmetf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=129.187.255.137 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=tum.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tum.de Received: from lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TXhny4cG0zySP; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:17:58 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=tum.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tum.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:x-mailer:message-id:date:date:subject :subject:from:from:received:received; s=tu-postout21; t= 1707643077; bh=aEaq/TzcHg4rMQdODyuar0MImODB9bbF3bqWLrgPZ6Y=; b=f XFBmetfZhZDsxhHssUdJ4P4/rpNM0n5RT2MIBdcyB5bpqrqppaYsNOuzr/gGCkgS nTrGDgH/VL5I5MGiBKzSMHJSGI/5N5q+hekl2twLc6nhB0j2rre590B2OSQ2AAZ0 7AlxNkL9QA8DOGEbfNBAnDvG6h5yVLi5e3L8uAE7pVHUmO2xVKQaXnby9ij5Tivc VexJVFItZhwdYsfMSJsBC4SIS7dVMdhs6fP6IShahynj4Kg0g8d44t2LuwWb6FHH 1JPgLzXzkxaFnmrvSc06tf38Bm8v70CfZdCS+BxAgVwDB2SjVO4nqMx8RAv4E/Ij Rj8RHFknFAcndq+lJSD3w== X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.88 X-Spam-Level: Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id voYhHrpRVFxn; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:17:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from sienna.fritz.box (ppp-93-104-92-100.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.92.100]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TXhnx1Vk2zySF; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:17:57 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= To: paul.heidekrueger@tum.de Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, andreyknvl@gmail.com, dvyukov@google.com, elver@google.com, glider@google.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, Mark Rutland Subject: [PATCH v2] kasan: add atomic tests Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:17:20 +0000 Message-Id: <20240211091720.145235-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20240202113259.3045705-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de> References: <20240202113259.3045705-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Test that KASan can detect some unsafe atomic accesses. As discussed in the linked thread below, these tests attempt to cover the most common uses of atomics and, therefore, aren't exhaustive. CC: Marco Elver CC: Andrey Konovalov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131210041.686657-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de/T/#u Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 Reviewed-by: Marco Elver Tested-by: Marco Elver Acked-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Paul Heidekrüger --- Changes PATCH v1 -> PATCH v2: * Make explicit cast implicit as per Mark's feedback * Increase the size of the "a2" allocation as per Andrey's feedback * Add tags Changes PATCH RFC v2 -> PATCH v1: * Remove casts to void* * Remove i_safe variable * Add atomic_long_* test cases * Carry over comment from kasan_bitops_tags() Changes PATCH RFC v1 -> PATCH RFC v2: * Adjust size of allocations to make kasan_atomics() work with all KASan modes * Remove comments and move tests closer to the bitops tests * For functions taking two addresses as an input, test each address in a separate function call. * Rename variables for clarity * Add tests for READ_ONCE(), WRITE_ONCE(), smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() mm/kasan/kasan_test.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c index 8281eb42464b..7bf09699b145 100644 --- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c @@ -1150,6 +1150,84 @@ static void kasan_bitops_tags(struct kunit *test) kfree(bits); } +static void kasan_atomics_helper(struct kunit *test, void *unsafe, void *safe) +{ + int *i_unsafe = unsafe; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, READ_ONCE(*i_unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, WRITE_ONCE(*i_unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, smp_load_acquire(i_unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, smp_store_release(i_unsafe, 42)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_read(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_set(unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_add(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_sub(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_inc(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_dec(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_and(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_andnot(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_or(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_xor(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_xchg(unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_cmpxchg(unsafe, 21, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_try_cmpxchg(unsafe, safe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_try_cmpxchg(safe, unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_sub_and_test(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_dec_and_test(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_inc_and_test(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_add_negative(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_add_unless(unsafe, 21, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_inc_not_zero(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_inc_unless_negative(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_dec_unless_positive(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_dec_if_positive(unsafe)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_read(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_set(unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_add(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_sub(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_inc(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_dec(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_and(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_andnot(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_or(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_xor(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_xchg(unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_cmpxchg(unsafe, 21, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(unsafe, safe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(safe, unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_sub_and_test(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_dec_and_test(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_inc_and_test(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_add_negative(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_add_unless(unsafe, 21, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_inc_not_zero(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_inc_unless_negative(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_dec_unless_positive(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_dec_if_positive(unsafe)); +} + +static void kasan_atomics(struct kunit *test) +{ + void *a1, *a2; + + /* + * Just as with kasan_bitops_tags(), we allocate 48 bytes of memory such + * that the following 16 bytes will make up the redzone. + */ + a1 = kzalloc(48, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, a1); + a2 = kzalloc(sizeof(atomic_long_t), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, a1); + + /* Use atomics to access the redzone. */ + kasan_atomics_helper(test, a1 + 48, a2); + + kfree(a1); + kfree(a2); +} + static void kmalloc_double_kzfree(struct kunit *test) { char *ptr; @@ -1553,6 +1631,7 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = { KUNIT_CASE(kasan_strings), KUNIT_CASE(kasan_bitops_generic), KUNIT_CASE(kasan_bitops_tags), + KUNIT_CASE(kasan_atomics), KUNIT_CASE(kmalloc_double_kzfree), KUNIT_CASE(rcu_uaf), KUNIT_CASE(workqueue_uaf), -- 2.40.1