Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3b8b:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id nd11csp2329482rdb; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:35:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHAgBaE/pVR8e8mVF8c52elGWgctKJDtt8aPhKDsdIskZ9TrdiqCenLLJuCQmJDlwhN+sid X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2184:b0:785:c661:38e6 with SMTP id g4-20020a05620a218400b00785c66138e6mr6480678qka.50.1707726930714; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:35:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707726930; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NNPO4q1dwdLBj3mdAoGaPzVGOV09DQVRt5puLSvtIbt6VaxFsjAO2kFD5OFtzNPG10 tCERbpuYUYsvn+i5ZWurlkkbUmD17dOoICkharq34Q2snM6/AouLriJWoZXQXw7jCepE +dM7TOk26b0Dxx3FTtoFVEAdKUWUj/skY5Ou1zOuuZe7u23f4eltGM500iEAxiVOK2+O hJF6jkpUf8cGTFL4UCX6faSJyX+Xr6jDXhrwEc4vd75uXTvW7DwOyoY3A3HGhrY50odh 9O2ar5exwJv6HyrYK3L88p/oLUPdowDOLTZSDtMpG1/cKVZpTuiUMgjfghd4udNePLub G1dg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=4Vrq6pH7f9iGB8LwYV2/mtF1jhtmkM8pYMdQmJLjgFk=; fh=y+KaOZXNlMNlYRB4h3tyeaBzuYrL+Q6iwHV55hL1OQc=; b=KhgQk6gyQdlBL4G8jD5NKgT4lLDKpoNoPe11Rwf71sfWxHIcyKsJNOm5v3GhhhdnuE otQcQO0kZ7TyGSGkGWN36cuwEa7KXlBjrECBo+2Hse2p7mb0UT2jkiT6JNvqf7xwpepr IN7HLehcLzRs10v/gpF1LYXQPlcCJ+u3tgI302m8yuUhc3mVohMmCN0Y0tKpS4f2v49G ippiA7RkBW7hpghDhuwiaPajNsDCEuvEtLZIlyhswZr+7mBKsPTojruQKAdmmArM2HfX RWOpJ0tZ5HSR/FhtnQ4NMixW8vNiydzwk2sjaq8tpWMF4x03LwD02yGBueRzNPnCXHDx Wq7w==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tum.de header.s=tu-postout21 header.b=eP+lL5so; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=tum.de dkim=pass dkdomain=tum.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=tum.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-61208-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-61208-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=tum.de X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXU1Rn3oGCDPOySL/Q0OUxKbp6em2BgTxl+ygMph+kCMJae+ekNkFN9zajdfsKDcGrY2ObOMJXxL4CMbtgUKQKJrfCDQPf4XrCEhjEsnA== Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z25-20020ae9c119000000b00783fb4f6fbcsi5144378qki.529.2024.02.12.00.35.30 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-61208-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tum.de header.s=tu-postout21 header.b=eP+lL5so; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=tum.de dkim=pass dkdomain=tum.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=tum.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-61208-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-61208-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=tum.de Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A81B11C208F6 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368CF12B81; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tum.de header.i=@tum.de header.b="eP+lL5so" Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de (postout2.mail.lrz.de [129.187.255.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754AE10A1F for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=129.187.255.138 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707726875; cv=none; b=qP4qU8pQQh9mDBlOALy1xhP9sTuCB33lKfEsAJWaexeCOHj4DTAGAgDRNOctC+WLxvyau+4ZSHgdfjkvC8ZcYKlcSS2dRswnLf5kovluK/q4IMF7oXXGQH45SrePI/Zm3Wo4DBp3BQbd+yL6OSKsafFdIcVasAIuM7LTxVSyxeY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707726875; c=relaxed/simple; bh=63/KQ22XZagYlqAxmscXTKOnUwxan5bZ489uORJotHg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y7Bw+KLWLRjBDTtCg/swz2rmXmZa7Qf9+PdR9Ko2BKVG9Dmw1aTyc54jUhPxrjqWUkcl9wcnJVq1pWmYhgEEIe+Rpmi4+Qrf2atilanOi11eluJVpzzJ5p2W0/9aN2JpmTA3W50d+rqH+XMrbrYhLUwV1Hucke/PWl6GeTGz7Jk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=tum.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tum.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tum.de header.i=@tum.de header.b=eP+lL5so; arc=none smtp.client-ip=129.187.255.138 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=tum.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tum.de Received: from lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TYHnB5NqfzyV2; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:34:22 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=tum.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tum.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:x-mailer:message-id:date:date:subject :subject:from:from:received:received; s=tu-postout21; t= 1707726862; bh=63/KQ22XZagYlqAxmscXTKOnUwxan5bZ489uORJotHg=; b=e P+lL5soTdN5dYXbkIZyhFde2t9wTh/6jG9u93h937pr9CBBE2G8s9bggKfzNKjFo ZwAAuhyWOGFkoIgI9klA9Hg1Vx9K/GPHYn/G4bAEgKYr+q5P9G+jfQEyWd9Hg9+Y WvCewye1kjmUHiDF9yOo0n8isZ/Oj5zL+VAN2JqICiZrcjRv3NQdP++1UAmLCJkB n90OHiI62UOlIeueycB0kMJyovvJHtDKn4JGSv2H8QMEk64Iu5GokCic2Ed9gIOy dYbCzjH5Jh6eoxQ/Nxla+QUzTiHRNXjDrRnLWYuqQczpKdHEPupIBgyjvNF7pXMC 0lqDnIyP8NpCBbochH4OQ== X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.88 X-Spam-Level: Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id MRHxCgA6u-EA; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:34:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from sienna.fritz.box (ppp-93-104-66-45.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.66.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TYHn85xP7zyRX; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:34:20 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= To: paul.heidekrueger@tum.de Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, andreyknvl@gmail.com, dvyukov@google.com, elver@google.com, glider@google.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v3] kasan: add atomic tests Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:33:42 +0000 Message-Id: <20240212083342.3075850-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20240211091720.145235-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de> References: <20240211091720.145235-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Test that KASan can detect some unsafe atomic accesses. As discussed in the linked thread below, these tests attempt to cover the most common uses of atomics and, therefore, aren't exhaustive. CC: Marco Elver CC: Andrey Konovalov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131210041.686657-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de/T/#u Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 Reviewed-by: Marco Elver Tested-by: Marco Elver Acked-by: Mark Rutland Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov Signed-off-by: Paul Heidekrüger --- Changes PATCH v2 -> PATCH v3: * Fix the wrong variable being used when checking a2 after allocation * Add Andrey's reviewed-by tag Changes PATCH v1 -> PATCH v2: * Make explicit cast implicit as per Mark's feedback * Increase the size of the "a2" allocation as per Andrey's feedback * Add tags Changes PATCH RFC v2 -> PATCH v1: * Remove casts to void* * Remove i_safe variable * Add atomic_long_* test cases * Carry over comment from kasan_bitops_tags() Changes PATCH RFC v1 -> PATCH RFC v2: * Adjust size of allocations to make kasan_atomics() work with all KASan modes * Remove comments and move tests closer to the bitops tests * For functions taking two addresses as an input, test each address in a separate function call. * Rename variables for clarity * Add tests for READ_ONCE(), WRITE_ONCE(), smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() mm/kasan/kasan_test.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c index 8281eb42464b..7f0f87a2c3c4 100644 --- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c @@ -1150,6 +1150,84 @@ static void kasan_bitops_tags(struct kunit *test) kfree(bits); } +static void kasan_atomics_helper(struct kunit *test, void *unsafe, void *safe) +{ + int *i_unsafe = unsafe; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, READ_ONCE(*i_unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, WRITE_ONCE(*i_unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, smp_load_acquire(i_unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, smp_store_release(i_unsafe, 42)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_read(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_set(unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_add(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_sub(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_inc(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_dec(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_and(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_andnot(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_or(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_xor(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_xchg(unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_cmpxchg(unsafe, 21, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_try_cmpxchg(unsafe, safe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_try_cmpxchg(safe, unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_sub_and_test(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_dec_and_test(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_inc_and_test(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_add_negative(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_add_unless(unsafe, 21, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_inc_not_zero(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_inc_unless_negative(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_dec_unless_positive(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_dec_if_positive(unsafe)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_read(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_set(unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_add(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_sub(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_inc(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_dec(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_and(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_andnot(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_or(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_xor(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_xchg(unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_cmpxchg(unsafe, 21, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(unsafe, safe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(safe, unsafe, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_sub_and_test(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_dec_and_test(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_inc_and_test(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_add_negative(42, unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_add_unless(unsafe, 21, 42)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_inc_not_zero(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_inc_unless_negative(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_dec_unless_positive(unsafe)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, atomic_long_dec_if_positive(unsafe)); +} + +static void kasan_atomics(struct kunit *test) +{ + void *a1, *a2; + + /* + * Just as with kasan_bitops_tags(), we allocate 48 bytes of memory such + * that the following 16 bytes will make up the redzone. + */ + a1 = kzalloc(48, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, a1); + a2 = kzalloc(sizeof(atomic_long_t), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, a2); + + /* Use atomics to access the redzone. */ + kasan_atomics_helper(test, a1 + 48, a2); + + kfree(a1); + kfree(a2); +} + static void kmalloc_double_kzfree(struct kunit *test) { char *ptr; @@ -1553,6 +1631,7 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = { KUNIT_CASE(kasan_strings), KUNIT_CASE(kasan_bitops_generic), KUNIT_CASE(kasan_bitops_tags), + KUNIT_CASE(kasan_atomics), KUNIT_CASE(kmalloc_double_kzfree), KUNIT_CASE(rcu_uaf), KUNIT_CASE(workqueue_uaf), -- 2.40.1