Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-61393-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 12:07:06 +0100
From: Roland Hieber <rhi@pengutronix.de>
To: Hiago De Franco <hiagofranco@gmail.com>
Cc: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MXSFB error: -ENODEV: Cannot connect bridge
Message-ID: <20240212110706.ibrreoj2wgzhltyw@pengutronix.de>
References: <34yzygh3mbwpqr2re7nxmhyxy3s7qmqy4vhxvoyxnoguktriur@z66m7gvpqlia>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <34yzygh3mbwpqr2re7nxmhyxy3s7qmqy4vhxvoyxnoguktriur@z66m7gvpqlia>

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 12:58:02PM -0300, Hiago De Franco wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> while doing some tests with kernel v6.8-rc3 and Colibri iMX7D, we
> noticed the following error:
> 
> [    0.432547] mxsfb 30730000.lcdif: error -ENODEV: Cannot connect bridge
> 
> This was introduced by commit edbbae7fba495284f72f05768696572691231558
> ("ARM: dts: imx7: add MIPI-DSI support"). This patch is routing the
> lcdif to the mipi_dsi_in_lcdif endpoint, however we do not have the DSI
> pins available in our edge connector. Instead, we use the parallel RGB
> LCD interface directly with, as example, an external LVDS transmitter:
> 
> &lcdif {
> ...
> 	status = "disabled";
> 
> 	port {
> 		lcdif_out: endpoint {
> 			remote-endpoint = <&lcd_panel_in>;
> 		};
> 	};
> };
> 
> By applying the following patch, the issue is gone and the LVDS works
> again:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7s.dtsi
> index ebf7befcc11e..9c81c6baa2d3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7s.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7s.dtsi
> @@ -834,16 +834,6 @@ lcdif: lcdif@30730000 {
>  					<&clks IMX7D_LCDIF_PIXEL_ROOT_CLK>;
>  				clock-names = "pix", "axi";
>  				status = "disabled";
> -
> -				port {
> -					#address-cells = <1>;
> -					#size-cells = <0>;
> -
> -					lcdif_out_mipi_dsi: endpoint@0 {
> -						reg = <0>;
> -						remote-endpoint = <&mipi_dsi_in_lcdif>;
> -					};
> -				};
>  			};
>  
>  			mipi_csi: mipi-csi@30750000 {
> @@ -895,22 +885,6 @@ mipi_dsi: dsi@30760000 {
>  				samsung,esc-clock-frequency = <20000000>;
>  				samsung,pll-clock-frequency = <24000000>;
>  				status = "disabled";
> -
> -				ports {
> -					#address-cells = <1>;
> -					#size-cells = <0>;
> -
> -					port@0 {
> -						reg = <0>;
> -						#address-cells = <1>;
> -						#size-cells = <0>;
> -
> -						mipi_dsi_in_lcdif: endpoint@0 {
> -							reg = <0>;
> -							remote-endpoint = <&lcdif_out_mipi_dsi>;
> -						};
> -					};
> -				};
>  			};
>  		};
> 
> I would like to know your opinion about this patch before sending it,
> does it makes sense for you? I understand that routing to endpoint
> should be done in the SoM device tree, so we are free to rout other
> endpoint without issues.

As far as I understood, the LCDIF -> DSI connection is always present in
the SoC. Can you overwrite the routing in your dts like this:?

    &lcdif_out_mipi_dsi {
        remote-endpoint = <&lcd_panel_in>;
    };

I'm not sure what is the best default solution here for imx7s.dtsi. Also
the labels don't work out in that case, this could be improved.

Regards,
 
 - Roland

-- 
Roland Hieber, Pengutronix e.K.          | r.hieber@pengutronix.de     |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                     | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686         | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |