Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3b8b:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id nd11csp2570405rdb; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:57:40 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCWzIdX2kM5/m3QD8QZq3dBZBMcGYT11Oy1rUtFJQHFkh65j0t+J57kV/X+ctXfued23tie7EzolLpskBdFhbmj+V9uOuaHYEmbeqH4Y6A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGY0O5EAkEvF4OHl0/hEiK2aBScmWUndDWrPRaY1YeAXQYVpwHxcBpZNl1s7gbtL1Az3WdR X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e605:0:b0:785:b88a:1437 with SMTP id z5-20020ae9e605000000b00785b88a1437mr8069165qkf.37.1707757060180; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:57:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707757060; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NEYmQBJic1BhvyaagfqbfngAFIGqfJ4wK21W5RmcEMkOGx90Vd00f7vn2Gf1tO6ReN ZzkKuxwz7qSrghhzkG4VKU9rFyleXcYkkf8W8e64NfcgkNql7Ot4Uipyd2XVFqgGOvNp fNJbLvk1UNU/gEMvrahdKrSwFU9KtMn6+CAD2/4oEh/yfQh8ePCkTZMsMdYxkg7s3KG6 qCY32UHgqnS0b6RhiQ3CxsHndgo9ptodsO/aPX4wBwxIVHX/P4SyrhKhtkWuvtbIhOC1 HZp6MII6dp8bZnEphWiuZCyRGOJFRffA5YC8HsNQeTK8VGar+oly7fJf9OvrlRRnJCG3 lLaw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=qx9SIBs0DCkiavZ6EEG5JRCINxSbQhfzQQFjHdEbL88=; fh=SGfF1sxNKb3I7wI0hKzJaXn3X7zVIEMFTA230/I7VUQ=; b=ORb1X2R2Cin3QN/XPEg2EvA92pCFs7mLl0ckNYIDJ/sI98lOG8A0VvIJ59s5fHHplp /9hQPh0uAaIDEXi5fIRFVUeCpnomFCLa8f3Xba90TiGKUn0gJs8R7wXGDlvBs3Nv2B0L 1OigI0AXUGY0tW01prt+A5tHhoTAadTSg8Z65xvM4LDuOwf8U3a18CTjhDY0xB6a8wW9 +mQjz6nDNTpcTuaYzFjPIfC7Be/2stzrX7PaRn+8uZekNgUWclfP6pJdqP30uhfu+ShM stAlfft+YlZ10lh8B0nyrHi0dzsg13AA65CwSkiBwfmk5KnwMD+5SM2YUaa4VdSMVweO QRuQ==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=arm.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=arm.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-62024-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-62024-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXTPGNJXiiyEoE/F8vulLotcYx9uD+9QwO9EWyIF5DkTjSEijuMIkjELJTk2sbezus5pM6fkL9Fz9Nd53+a463SMPlwOx8At4Qtkd50Dg== Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g18-20020a05620a40d200b00785d4349943si3237499qko.232.2024.02.12.08.57.40 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:57:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-62024-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=arm.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=arm.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-62024-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-62024-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E67A01C21D6E for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA0B3D986; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C282629C for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707756892; cv=none; b=jL/tA1gD6UwnhGBn4K591KahD3WnsvOW9IlwayIZeW7k/SZDQOpzHVwmn4wOVU5QbAA6v16X7BssYvXaX7Q1P+6g/CNMNR3wYqEjBYUD0EfJirx2wPPEAmv1ESwmsmJtp1R5yqABIY//cHoMsWwOSgqXbA1bkXLrl8pPk/8Rq8I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707756892; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8XJlfKI7qCRZiFjdMvUanEGADCWAeJ5w8mUzbgIqBtE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VUccxFSC6nSj8/M5tpdYrNbtOlX6u1DnR/VhuNNxRRZAVNyl65vdrdiy1lwON+9PC8lhIuMDG4Ytmnr4WbBRF2MpfIpfVxEyYG5hgWOWhae6zVenDNnmo+8ZiJt/1FFPqXUJ7kPWN9ZGDzWMCEAHa1QFStW5MOi4tJTvkyrEGms= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB083DA7; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:55:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from e133344.arm.com (e133344.arm.com [10.1.25.137]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE38C3F762; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:54:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:54:47 +0000 From: Dave Martin To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/sve: Document that __SVE_VQ_MAX is much larger than needed Message-ID: References: <20240209-arm64-sve-vl-max-comment-v2-1-111b283469ee@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240209-arm64-sve-vl-max-comment-v2-1-111b283469ee@kernel.org> On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 04:53:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > __SVE_VQ_MAX is defined without comment as 512 but the actual > architectural maximum is 16, a substantial difference which might not > be obvious to readers especially given the several different units used > for specifying vector sizes in various contexts and the fact that it's > often used via macros. In an effort to minimise surprises for users who > might assume the value is the architectural maximum and use it to do > things like size allocations add a comment noting the difference, and > add a note for SVE_VQ_MAX to aid discoverability. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown > --- > Changes in v2: > - Use new wording mostly provided by Dave Martin. > - Reference __SVE_VQ_MAX comment near SVE_VQ_MAX define. > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240206-arm64-sve-vl-max-comment-v1-1-dddf16414412@kernel.org > --- > arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sve_context.h | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sve_context.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sve_context.h > index 754ab751b523..72aefc081061 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sve_context.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sve_context.h > @@ -13,6 +13,17 @@ > > #define __SVE_VQ_BYTES 16 /* number of bytes per quadword */ > > +/* > + * Yes, __SVE_VQ_MAX is 512 QUADWORDS. > + * > + * To help ensure forward portability, this is much larger than the > + * current maximum value defined by the SVE architecture. While arrays > + * or static allocations can be sized based on this value, watch out! > + * It will waste a surprisingly large amount of memory. > + * > + * Dynamic sizing based on the actual runtime vector length is likely to > + * be preferable for most purposes. > + */ > #define __SVE_VQ_MIN 1 > #define __SVE_VQ_MAX 512 Acked-by: Dave Martin [...]